Controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of manual therapy techniques for the management of impingement syndrome. However, no adequately powered clinical trials have examined the effects of mobilization-with-movement. The purpose of the current study was to perform a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of real MWM to a group receiving a sham intervention on shoulder pain at different moments and active shoulder range of motion in an adequately powered sample of patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
42
Francisco Alburquerque Sendín
Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Changes in the intensity of shoulder pain before and after the treatment
Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their pain using an 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS; 0: no pain; 10: maximum pain) for 3 scores of perceived pain: 1, the intensity of shoulder pain experienced in the last 24h; 2, the intensity of shoulder pain at night; 3, the intensity of shoulder pain during shoulder flexion.
Time frame: Baseline and one week after intervention
Changes in shoulder range of motion before and after the treatment
A universal goniometer was used to assess the participant's shoulder range of motion in the following motions: * Pain-free and maximum (painful) range of motion in shoulder flexion * Pain-free range of motion in shoulder extension * Pain-free range of motion in shoulder abduction * Pain-free range of motion in shoulder external rotation * Pain-free range of motion in shoulder medial (internal) rotation
Time frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.