Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a small (\< 10%) chance of long-term survival. Despite the treatment of elderly AML patients with intensive chemotherapy, the survival has not been improved during the last decades. The purpose of this study is to determine whether frontline therapy with a 10-day decitabine schedule provides a better survival than standard intensive combination chemotherapy in elderly AML patients (\>= 60 years).
* The overall survival (OS) of older AML patients has not been improved during the last decades with intensive chemotherapy based on cytarabine combined with an anthracycline ("3+7"). * Next generation sequencing technology reveals that mutations in genes involved in epigenetics are frequently mutated in AML (e.g. DNMT3a), suggesting an important role of epigenetics in the pathophysiology of AML. Decitabine (given in a 5-day schedule) has been shown to be superior to low-dose Ara-C. * A retrospective analysis revealed that epigenetic therapy (either azacitidine or decitabine) is associated with similar survival rates as intensive chemotherapy in older patients (n=671) with newly diagnosed AML. * The recently published encouraging phase 2 data with the 10-day decitabine schedule suggests that decitabine results in similar CR rates compared with intensive chemotherapy. Allogeneic transplantation (alloHCT) also offers the opportunity for cure among older AML patients, therefore treatment strategies should aim to allograft older AML patients. * Decitabine treatment can lead to very interesting cure rates when used as "bridging" to allografting. Based on the data summarized above, we hypothesize that decitabine at a daily dose of 20 mg/m² starting with the 10-day schedule followed by an alloHCT or by continuation of 5-days decitabine cycles is superior to conventional intensive chemotherapy in older AML patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
606
1. Cycle 1 1. daunorubicin (60 mg/m²) infusion (15-30 min) for 3 days 2. cytarabine (200 mg/m²) continuous infusion (24 hrs) for 7 days. 2. Cycle 2 1. daunorubicin (45 mg/m²) infusion (15-30 min) for 3 days 2. cytarabine (200 mg/m²) continuous infusion (24 hrs) for 7 days. 3. Cycle 3 (mini-ICE) 1. idarubicin (8 mg/m²) infusion (15-30 min) for 3 days 2. cytarabine (100 mg/m²) continuous infusion (24 hrs) for 5 days 3. etoposide (100 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 3 days 4. Cycle 4 (mini-ICE) (optional) 1. idarubicin (8 mg/m²) infusion (15-30 min) for 3 days 2. cytarabine (100 mg/m²) continuous infusion (24 hrs) for 5 days 3. etoposide (100 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 3 days
1. Cycle 1: decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 10 days 2. Cycle 2 1. if bone marrow (BM) blasts \< 5%: decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 5 days 2. if BM blasts \>= 5%: decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 10 days 3. Cycle 3 1. if BM blasts \< 5%: decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 5 days 2. if BM blasts \>= 5%: decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 10 days 4. Cycle 4-6: decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 5 days 5. Continuation therapy from Cycle 7 and until 'progression or toxicity': decitabine (20 mg/m²) infusion (1 hr) for 5 days or 3 days Note: All patients considered eligible for transplant should be consolidated with alloHCT once donor is available.
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Occurrence of adverse events (AEs)
The events are graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization to the date of either first progression, first relapse or death, whichever occurs first
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Transplantation feasibility
Percentage of patients transplanted
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Outcome post-transplantation
PFS, incidence of relapse or progression, and incidence of non-relapse or progression related mortality
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Health economics impact of each treatment arm
At the end of each cycle, duration of hospitalization and number of visits (planned or related to event), number of transfusions, growth factor support and intravenous anti-infective are collected
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaires
EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) Elderly module (ELD14)
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Prognostic value of baseline physical and functional conditions on treatment outcome using geriatric assessment tools
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
UZ Antwerpen
Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium
UZ Brussel
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
CHR Verviers
Verviers, Liège, Belgium
A.Z. St. Jan
Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
C.H.U. Sart-Tilman
Liège, Belgium
CHR De La Citadelle
Liège, Belgium
National Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases
Sofia, Bulgaria
Clinical Hospital Merkur
Zagreb, Croatia
University Hospital Rebro
Zagreb, Croatia
...and 43 more locations
Short physical performance battery (SPPB) and activities of daily living (ADL)
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
complete response (CR/CRi) rate
All patients who reached complete response (CR) or complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) after the administration of protocol treatment ("3+7" or decitabine)
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Overall CR/CRi rate
All patients who reached CR or CRi, after administration of the protocol treatment ("3+7" or decitabine) or following another salvage/new treatment for AML (other than transplant)
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in
Disease-free survival (DFS) from CR or CRi
The time between the date of CR or CRi and the date of first relapse or death (whatever the cause), whichever occurs first
Time frame: 4.9 years from first patient in