This study compares two ways of placing a dental implant on the day of tooth extraction. One method will place a additional bone graft (derived from bovine bone) and the other group will not have the graft placed. Both groups will be restored at the same time with an immediate crown. The investigators will be researching and comparing the changes in gum level that occur after each surgical method, as well as changes in jaw width where the implant is placed. The investigators will enroll 16 patients per group. The patients will be followed for 3, 6, and 12 months post-immediate implant placement to observe healing.
The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the soft tissue dimensional changes after extraction of teeth in the esthetic zone, when combined with the placement of implants into these fresh extraction sockets. In addition, the effect of placing a graft material, such as Bio-Oss Collagen® into the gap between implant and the labial plate of bone will be evaluated after an immediately loaded provisional restoration is placed. 32 subjects will have an immediate dental implant placed in the maxillary anterior region (#4-12) after extraction of a hopeless tooth. 16 subjects will be randomly selected to receive Bio-Oss Collagen® (Test group) and 16 subjects will have no graft (Control group) in the gap between the implant and the labial plate of bone. Hopeless maxillary anterior teeth will be extracted and implants will be placed in a flapless procedure. Implants will be immediately loaded with provisional restorations once determined that the implant is stable. Changes in vertical height and horizontal dimensional changes of the free gingival margins will be evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-immediate implant placement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
32
Experimental: placement of BioOss Collagen No intervention: no BioOss Collagen
Columbia University, College of Dental Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Mean Bucco-Lingual Change at 3mm
The horizontal dimensional change from a digital superimposition at 3mm apical to the baseline free gingival margin position was measured.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Mean Bucco-Lingual Change at 4mm
The horizontal dimensional change from a digital superimposition at 4mm apical to the baseline free gingival margin position was measured.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in Vertical Dimension of Buccal Soft Tissue (Distal Papilla)
The mean change was calculated from a tooth-supported stent to the free gingival margin.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in Vertical Dimension of Buccal Soft Tissue (Mid-buccal)
The mean change was calculated from a tooth-supported stent to the free gingival margin.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in Vertical Dimension of Buccal Soft Tissue (Mesial Papilla)
The mean change was calculated from a tooth-supported stent to the free gingival margin.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Periodontal Probing Depth
The periodontal probing depth will be measured in mm.
Time frame: 12 months
Thickness of Keratinized Tissue at 3mm
Tissue thickness was measured at 3mm from the free gingival margin (FGM) using a 15-endodontic file and a rubber stopper.
Time frame: 12 months
Thickness of Keratinized Tissue at 4mm
Tissue thickness was measured at 4mm from the free gingival margin (FGM) using a 15-endodontic file and a rubber stopper.
Time frame: 12 months
Thickness of Keratinized Tissue at 8mm
Tissue thickness was measured at 8mm from the free gingival margin (FGM) using a 15-endodontic file and a rubber stopper.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.