The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of roxadustat for treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in anemic patients with Stage 3, 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are not on dialysis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
2,781
The initial study drug dose is 70 mg three times a week (TIW). The dose is subsequently adjusted to achieve and maintain Hb 11±1 g/dL.
The initial study drug dose is 70 mg three times a week (TIW). The dose is subsequently adjusted to achieve and maintain Hb 11±1 g/dL.
Mean Change From Baseline in Hb Averaged Over Week 28 to Week 52
Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of the last 3 central laboratory Hb values from the screening and randomization visits. Mean change in Hb from baseline to mean value from Week 28 to Week 52 was analyzed using a missing at random (MAR) based multiple imputation analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline Hb, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), cardiovascular (CV) history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effect covariates. The adjusted least squares (LS) mean estimates of change from baseline to mean during Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 28 to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Hb Response During the First 24 Weeks of Treatment
Hb response was defined as: * Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL and Hb increase from baseline by ≥ 1.0 g/dL for participants with baseline Hb \> 8.0 g/dL; or * Hb increase from baseline by ≥ 2.0 g/dL, for participants with baseline Hb ≤ 8.0 g/dL at 2 consecutive visits (with available data) separated at least 5 days during the first 24 weeks of treatment without having received rescue therapy (red blood cell \[RBC\] transfusion, erythropoietin analogue, or intravenous \[IV\] iron) prior to Hb response. The percentage of participants with an Hb response during the first 24 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) up to Week 24.
Mean Change From Baseline in Hb Averaged Over Week 28 to Week 52 in Participants With Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Greater Than the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Baseline hsCRP was quantified from stored biomarker samples obtained at randomization. Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of the last 3 central laboratory Hb values from the screening and randomization visits. Mean change in Hb from baseline to mean value during Week 28 to Week 52 was analyzed using a MAR based multiple imputation ANCOVA model with baseline Hb, baseline eGFR, CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effect covariates. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from baseline in participants with baseline hsCRP \>ULN to mean during Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Research Site
Bakersfield, California, United States
Research Site
El Centro, California, United States
Research Site
Escondido, California, United States
Research Site
Glendale, California, United States
Research Site
Long Beach, California, United States
Research Site
Long Beach, California, United States
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
...and 349 more locations
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 28 to Week 52.
Proportion of Total Time of Interpolated Hb Values Greater Than or Equal To 10 g/dL From Week 28 to Week 52
Proportion of total time of interpolated Hb values ≥10 g/dL was calculated as the time the linearly interpolated curve between measurements ≥10 g/dL divided by the time between measurements from Week 28 to Week 52. Proportion of total time was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline Hb and baseline eGFR as covariates, and CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effects. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
Time frame: Week 28 up to Week 52.
Proportion of Total Time of Interpolated Hb Values Within the Interval of 10 to 12 g/dL From Week 28 to Week 52
Proportion of total time of interpolated Hb values within the interval of 10 to 12 g/dL was calculated as the time the linearly interpolated curve between measurements were within 10 to 12 g/dL divided by the time between measurements from Week 28 to Week 52. Proportion of total time was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline Hb and baseline eGFR as covariates, and CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effects. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
Time frame: Week 28 up to Week 52.
Mean Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 24
Baseline LDL was defined as the last result obtained prior to randomization. Mean changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline to Week 24 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline LDL, baseline Hb and baseline eGFR as covariates, and CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effects. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from baseline to Week 24 are presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 24
Time-To-First Instance of Receiving IV Iron, RBC Transfusion or Erythropoietin Analogue as Rescue Therapy
Time-to-first rescue therapy (IV iron, RBC transfusion or erythropoietin analogue) was calculated as (date of first rescue therapy, or date of censoring if no rescue therapy was taken) minus (date of first dose of IP) +1. Event rate was calculated as (number of participants with event) divided by (the total number of days at risk for event across all participants in given group divided by 365.25) multiplied by 100. The event rate is presented for participants with events.
Time frame: Baseline (Day1, Week 0) up to End of Study (EOS) visit (4 weeks after the treatment period) (or up to date of first rescue therapy), with treatment duration up to 4 years.
Time-To-First Instance of Receiving a RBC Transfusion As Rescue Therapy
Time-to-first RBC rescue therapy was calculated as (date of first RBC rescue therapy, or date of censoring if no rescue therapy was taken) minus (date of first dose of IP) +1. Event rate was calculated as (number of participants with event) divided by (the total number of days at risk for event across all participants in given group divided by 365.25) multiplied by 100. The event rate is presented for participants with events.
Time frame: Baseline (Day1, Week 0) up to EOS visit (4 weeks after the treatment period) (or up to date of first RBC rescue therapy), with treatment duration up to 4 years.
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Vitality Sub-Score From Week 12 to Week 28
SF-36 is a Quality of Life (QoL) scale comprising 8 domains of health status: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional and Mental Health. Each domain score is on a scale from 0-100 (worst health possible to best health possible); higher scores indicate better health status. Mean change in SF-36 Vitality sub-score from baseline to mean from Week 12 to Week 28 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for baseline score, treatment group, baseline Hb, baseline eGFR, CV history, geographic region, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and participant as random effect. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from baseline to mean score from Week 12 to Week 28 are presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 12 to Week 28.
Annual Rate of eGFR Change From Baseline Prior to the Initiation of Dialysis or Kidney Transplant
Baseline eGFR was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory values prior to or at randomization. Rate of change in eGFR from baseline during the entire treatment period (in millilitres/minute/1.73 meters squared/years \[mL/min/1.73m\^2/years\]) was estimated using a random effects model using all post-baseline eGFR values prior to initiation of dialysis/transplant. Baseline eGFR, baseline Hb, geographic region, CV history, treatment group and post-baseline eGFR measurement time were used as fixed effects and participant and time (years) as random effects, ie, random intercept and slope.
Time frame: Baseline (Day1, Week 0) up to EOS visit (4 weeks after the treatment period), with treatment duration up to 4 years.
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Sub-Score From Week 12 to Week 28
SF-36 is a QoL scale comprising 8 domains of health status: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional and Mental Health. Each domain score is on a scale from 0-100 (worst health possible to best health possible); higher scores indicate better health status. Mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning sub-score from baseline to mean from Week 12 to Week 28 was analyzed using a MMRM with terms for baseline score, treatment group, baseline Hb, baseline eGFR, CV history, geographic region, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and participant as random effect. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from baseline to mean score from Week 12 to Week 28 are presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 12 to Week 28.