No trial has examined the the efficacy of amoxicillin and metronidazole based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori treatment. The study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of 14-day amoxicillin-/metronidazole-based quadruple regiment and classical quadruple regiment for Helicobacter pylori eradication.
Helicobacter pylori is the most successful human pathogen infecting an estimated 50% of the global population. It is a common and potentially curable cause of dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease. Eradication in patients with peptic ulcer or even functional or non-investigated dyspepsia is a cost effective approach. Most Consensus Conferences and Clinical Guidelines recommend the prescription of a triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and clarithromycin with either amoxicillin or metronidazole, as first-line treatment. However, the effectiveness of these triple-therapy regimens seems to have diminished over time, largely as a result of emerging resistance of the organism to clarithromycin. Due to the low efficacy achieved with these treatments, they have been deemed as unethical comparators in clinical trials. As antimicrobial resistance becomes more prevalent worldwide, treatment failure rates are likely to continue increasing, suggesting that new regimens for H pylori eradication must be sought. Bismuth-containing quadruple therapies have been used widely in H. pylori therapy with many permutations of doses and durations and with variable results. Classical bismuth-based quadruple therapy containing a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole has been recommended as the first-line treatment by the Maastricht IV Consensus Conference report and H. pylori Study Group of Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. But this regiment has high rate of side effects because of tetracycline. Standard triple therapy-based, bismuth-containing quadruple Therapy is also an alternative. Though addition bismuth and prolonging treatment duration can overcome H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin, its use as a first-line treatment is limited in areas of high clarithromycin resistance. Amoxicillin has low resistance rate as well as low percentage of side effects. The combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy may be a better choice, which can avoid clarithromycin resistance and reduce side effects. Therefore, we will do a randomized trial to compare the eradication rate of 14-day amoxicillin and metronidazole based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
215
antisecretory drug of each quadruple therapy
one component of each quadruple therapy
antibiotic of each quadruple therapy
Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori
Access eradication rate of H. pylori by intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis in each treatment group
Time frame: 2 months
Frequency of side effects of each treatment
Score side effects as mild, moderate or severe according to their influence on daily activities
Time frame: 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
antibiotic of the amoxicillin/metronidazole-based quadruple therapy
antibiotic of the amoxicillin/clarithromycin-based quadruple therapy