To investigate the efficacy and safety of hirudin plus aspirin therapy compared with warfarin in the secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
For the patients with cardioembolic stroke due to atrial fibrillation,guidelines recommended warfarin as the secondary prevention therapy. But warfarin has its disadvantages such as risk of bleeding and the requirement of frequent INR monitoring. The underuse of warfarin is a prominent problem in China. In our study, patients with cardioembolic stroke were treated with hirudin plus aspirin or warfarin. The aim of our study was to compare efficacy and safety of hirudin plus aspirin and warfarin in secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
239
natural hirudin 0.75g, three times a day (Brand name: Maixuekang capsule, Guizhou Xinbang Pharmaceutical Co., China) and aspirin 100mg, once daily
an initial dose of 1.25mg once daily. Three days later, INR of patients was checked every three days and the dose of warfarin was adjusted until reach the target range of 2 to 3. Since then INR monitoring was performed at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after stroke onset, targeting an INR between 2 and 3 and the dose of warfarin was adjusted accordingly.
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Efficacy outcome event: the recurrence of cardioembolic stroke
To compare the recurrence of cardioembolic stroke in hirudin plus aspirin group and the warfarin group.
Time frame: One year after stroke onset
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.