The overall objective of this study is to compare the effect on simulated driving performance of multifocal (MF) versus monovision (MV) soft contact lenses in mid-late presbyopes.
In this crossover study, subjects wore lotrafilcon B MV (AOAMV) and lotrafilcon B MF (AOAMF) soft contact lenses as randomized for 2 weeks each. Subjects were assessed using a standardised driving simulation for each of the two treatments. A fresh pair of lenses was dispensed for the assessment. Subjects also wore lotrafilcon B single vision distance (SVD) and comfilcon A MF contact lenses during Period 1 and Period 2 respectively for an additional same-day assessment. Habitual correction was worn for an acclimatization drive in the driving simulator during Period 1.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
33
Multifocal contact lenses worn in both eyes
Spherical contact lenses worn with 1 eye corrected for distance and 1 eye corrected for near
Spherical contact lenses worn with both eyes corrected for distance
Driving Reaction Time to Hazards (as Measured by Time to Brake, in Seconds)
Driving reaction time to hazards was assessed during simulated night time driving and measured as time to brake, in seconds. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. This outcome measure was prespecified for AOAMV and AOAMF.
Time frame: Week 2, each period
Standard Deviation of Lateral Positioning
The standard deviation of lateral positioning (staying in the lane) was assessed during simulated night time driving and measured as the distance of deviation from the reference point, in meters. This outcome measure is prespecified for AOAMV and AOAMF.
Time frame: Week 2, each period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Multifocal contact lenses worn in both eyes
Contact lenses worn in both eyes per subject's habitual prescription