Active Preoperative Anemia Management in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Anemia and transfusion are independent predictors of morbidity and mortality in the cardiac surgical patient population. Even so, active preoperative anemia management is not currently the standard of care at our institution. Cost associated with erythrocyte transfusions at University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) University Hospitals exceeds twenty million dollars annually, not including costs associated with treatment of known complications of red cell transfusions (renal insufficiency, respiratory failure, infection and prolonged length of stay, etc). Fifty percent of our cardiac surgical population suffer from preoperative anemia and 79% of these patients will receive one or more red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. In contrast, the incidence of RBC transfusion was only 35% in those without preoperative anemia in the calendar year 2011-12. The mechanism of injury in patients with preoperative anemia is either the duration/intensity of the anemia exposure and resultant organ ischemia, or the harmful effects of erythrocyte transfusion(s) itself. Active preoperative anemia management is a strategy that attempts to minimize both of these events, and in doing so, exert an additive or possibly synergistic effect on improving clinical outcomes. A randomized controlled trial utilizing a standardized transfusion strategy is a necessary step in determining if increases in preoperative hemoglobin lead to improved outcomes. A pilot, feasibility study is the first essential step in insuring the adequacy of future trials designed to answer this important question. The APART study is being conducted to test the safety and efficacy of using a short-course (1-4 weeks) of EPO plus Feraheme to increase erythrocyte mass. The findings will be used to guide the design of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) that examines the effects of active preoperative anemia management on erythrocyte transfusion and clinical outcomes. The RCT will test the hypothesis that a short-course (1-4 weeks) of EPO plus Feraheme is superior to the standard of care (SOC) at reducing transfusion and improving outcomes in anemic patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Means and standard deviations derived from pilot data on changes in hemoglobin levels, reticulocyte counts and differences in erythrocyte transfusions and clinical outcomes will be analyzed for possible use in sample size calculations for the larger RCT. This pilot will also provide information in determining logistics for timely completion of the RCT, and will also address data collection, data management, adherence to the study protocol, transfusion and surveillance strategies and classification of clinical outcomes and adverse events. Pilot Study Specific Aims Include: 1. To determine the proportion of patients who fulfill all the eligibility criteria for the study and agree to be part of a randomized trial of short-course EPO plus supplemental Feraheme (up to 3 doses given over a 1-4 week interval prior to surgery) vs. standard of care management in patients scheduled for coronary bypass grafting (CABG), valve surgery, or CABG/valve surgery. 2. To determine the adherence of patients and health care team to the procedures included in the study protocol (scheduled appointments, surveillance and transfusion strategies). 3. To determine the increase in hemoglobin levels and reticulocyte counts following a short-course of EPO plus supplemental Feraheme over a 1-4 week interval prior to the date of surgery vs. standard of care management in patients scheduled for CABG, valve, or CABG/valve surgery. 4. To assess differences in the proportion of patients receiving erythrocyte transfusions and number of blood products utilized (RBC, platelets and plasma) in the peri- and post-operative periods for those receiving a short-course of EPO plus supplemental Feraheme vs. standard of care management in patients scheduled for CABG, valve or CABG/valve surgery. 5. To determine the frequency and intensity of pre-defined clinical outcomes (mortality, major cardiac, renal, neurological events \[associated with anemia\] and infection) in the peri- and post-operative periods for those receiving a short-course of EPO plus Feraheme vs. standard of care management in patients scheduled for CABG, valve, or CABG/valve surgery. Differences in hemoglobin levels and reticulocyte counts from baseline to the day of surgery and postop day (POD) 5, proportion of patients receiving transfusions and number of blood products utilized and the pre-defined clinical events will be assessed between the two groups. Each patient will be enrolled in the study up to 28 days before the day of surgery and for up to 30 days following the day of surgery. This pilot, feasibility study will enroll 50 subjects (25 per group). Both groups will have detailed clinical data and biological specimens collected. Visits and Procedures: * Screening: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery (CABG, valve, CABG/valve) with anemia will be identified in advance of their operations. Basic features of patient medical and surgical histories (i.e. age, gender, type of surgery) will be screened. If eligible for the study based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will be consented into the study. * Baseline Visit: Data on demographics, lab results, vital signs, medical history, current medications, height/weight will be reviewed and recorded. Randomization by computer will be done and the patient will receive the 1st dose of study drugs, as assigned, then monitored for any serious reactions (chest pain, dyspnea, seizures, severe headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, increase in BP). Control group patients with evidence of iron-deficiency by laboratory criteria will be advised to initiate supplementation with a non-prescription, over-the-counter oral iron preparation (ferrous sulfate 325 mg, three times a day is commonly used) to be taken until the planned surgical operation. * Pre-op Visit: Patients will receive the 2nd dose of study drugs as assigned. Vital signs (heart rate, BP, oxygen saturation, temperature) will be recorded before and after drug administration, then monitored for any serious adverse events; SOC lab results; reticulocyte count, troponin, creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) samples will be collected. * Day of Surgery: Patient vital signs (BP, electrocardiogram \[EKG\], etc) will be monitored as part of standard of care. Reticulocyte count, iron panel (includes transferrin, ferritin, total iron binding capacity, iron level) samples will be collected. SOC lab results, record of transfusions, estimated blood loss, adverse events will be monitored/recorded. * POD 2: Troponin, CK-MB, Rotem (Rotational thromboelastometry) samples will be collected. Patients will receive study drug, as assigned, then monitored for serious events. * POD 1-7: Vital signs (BP, EKG, etc) will be monitored; SOC lab results, record of transfusions, and adverse events will be monitored/recorded. Estimated blood loss will be recorded on POD 1 and 2 only. * Other lab to be collected: POD 1 - reticulocyte count, iron panel, troponin, CK-MB; POD 2 - troponin, CK-MB, Rotem; POD 5 - reticulocyte count, iron panel, aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (AST/ALT); POD 7 - complete blood count (CBC), reticulocyte count, creatinine; POD 14 or discharge (whichever comes first) - CBC, creatinine. Transfusion Strategy: Erythrocyte transfusion is permitted during cardiopulmonary bypass, during surgery and afterwards per protocol, when criteria is met. Red cell transfusions should be given one unit at a time with measurement of the pre- and post-transfusion hemoglobin levels along with physiologic parameters used to assess adequacy of organ perfusion. A consensus for transfusion thresholds was established among anesthesiologists, perfusionists and surgeons in our practice. The transfusion thresholds implemented in this protocol reflects our current "standard of care;" a threshold at which clinicians generally believe the benefits of erythrocyte transfusion outweigh the risks. Adherence to the transfusion strategy will be recorded by the research nurse and protocol deviations will be discussed with the attending physician of record and a member of the clinical research team. However, research staff will not order nor prohibit erythrocyte transfusions. This will be left to the discretion of the treating physician(s) if he/she deems it clinically necessary. Following randomization, patient's charts will be clearly labeled to indicate participation in the study protocol. Surveillance Strategy: The decision to initiate and continue administering doses of EPO is based on evidence accrued from randomized controlled trials and clinical practice guidelines provided by multiple sub-specialty and international societies. Substantial heterogeneity exists in factors that could be included in a surveillance strategy to minimize the risk of a thrombotic event in this setting; with no one strategy proven to be superior. The surveillance strategy included in this protocol derives from, what we believe to be, the most current safety analyses of perioperative EPO use reflected in the literature. Implementing such surveillance methods are intended to minimize the possibly rare but potentially life-threatening adverse events. Risk factors considered in our surveillance strategy include: evidence of unstable angina or myocardial infarction, recent thrombotic event, hemoglobin levels associated with a higher risk of a myocardial event, excessive thrombocytosis or laboratory evidence of a hypercoagulable postoperative state. EPO dosing will be stratified based on patient risk (degree of perioperative anemia), type of procedure (CABG vs. valve) and laboratory data (hgb, Rotem). All doses will be given per surveillance guidelines. Primary End Point: The primary objective is to assess the enrollment rate and adherence to the dosing protocol and surveillance strategies. We define successful adherence as adherence to dosing in more than 90% of patients for more than 90% of the doses deemed appropriate by the surveillance strategy. Secondary outcomes will include changes in hemoglobin levels and reticulocyte counts within the two groups from baseline to the day of surgery and POD 5, number of RBC units transfused, frequency of pre-specified clinical outcomes and incidence of adverse events in each of the study groups. Data from this pilot study will be used for the power analysis and design of the larger RCT. Adverse events (AEs) are events that involve physiological, social, or psychological harm to subjects or risks of harm to additional subjects or others. AEs include expected and unexpected harmful effects, and unexpected risks of an interaction or an intervention. AEs may be caused by: the test article or test procedure, other aspects of the interaction or intervention, the subject's underlying condition, or the subject's concurrent standard treatment. AEs may be definitely related, probably related, possibly related, unlikely to be related, or definitely not related to the research. We will report all adverse events and other reportable incidences to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) per reporting guidelines. Any adverse event will be documented of that event including a description, subject number, date, outcome, and follow-up. The primary safety endpoints of the study are the incidence of adverse events associated with the use of the study medications. These include: hypersensitivity (e.g. pruritis, rash, and urticaria), hypertension, hypotension, bleeding, nausea, vomiting, injection site pain, deep venous thrombosis or other thrombotic complications. Surveillance for these adverse events will be conducted by direct observation (during drug administration), daily bedside visits by the research nurse for the first 7 postoperative days, review of the patients medical record and listing any of these complications in the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database. The definition of a stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), mesenteric artery occlusion or peripheral vascular event will be based on STS criteria. Any event resulting in death from time of initial drug administration to hospital discharge will be recorded. The Principal Investigator, along with the Secondary Investigators, will be responsible for the monitoring, reviewing and analyses of study data. This will be done quarterly unless an issue requires immediate attention or if a recurrent pattern develops into a need for a more frequent review. An interim analysis will be done at 50% enrollment by the principal and secondary investigators.