This randomized clinical trial studies survivorship care in reducing symptoms in young adult cancer survivors. Survivorship care programs that identify the needs of young adult cancer survivors and ways to support them through the years after treatment may help reduce symptoms, such as pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, and distress, in young adult cancer survivors.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To test the impact of providing the essential elements of survivorship care on survivorship outcomes as indicated by reduction in symptoms (pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, distress) in young adult cancer survivors diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 39 years when compared with usual care. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To improve confidence in survivorship knowledge and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. II. To provide evidence on barriers, needs and care preferences that will support long term follow-up recommendations for this population. OUTLINE: Participants categorized as high-need are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Participants categorized as low-need are assigned to Arm I. ARM I: Participants receive usual care. After 12 months, participants may receive a survivorship clinic visit and boosters as in Arm II. ARM II: Participants attend a survivorship clinic visit that includes care plans, screening recommendations, physician coordination, health promotion education, symptom management and palliative care, late effects education, psychosocial and medical assessments, and referrals for services and care as appropriate. Participants also receive phone-based survivorship boosters over approximately 15-30 minutes at 4-8 weeks and 12-16 weeks after the initial clinic visit. After completion of study, participants are followed up at 6 and 12 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
390
Receive survivorship care
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Receive phone-based booster intervention
UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado Cancer Center - Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Mean of the two z scores of the two highest scores for the symptoms that determined the participant's eligibility as "high need" assessed using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Mean scores for the primary outcome measures will be compared between the study using standard methods. Two-sided significance levels will be set at an alpha level of 0.05.
Time frame: At 6 months
Barriers to health care assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Change in depression assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available. The mean differences in other continuous valued outcomes will be evaluated using standard t-tests or linear regression models, as appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
Change in distress assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available. The mean differences in other continuous valued outcomes will be evaluated using standard t-tests or linear regression models, as appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
Change in fatigue assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available. The mean differences in other continuous valued outcomes will be evaluated using standard t-tests or linear regression models, as appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
Change in pain assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available. The mean differences in other continuous valued outcomes will be evaluated using standard t-tests or linear regression models, as appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
Change in sleep assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available. The mean differences in other continuous valued outcomes will be evaluated using standard t-tests or linear regression models, as appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
Confidence in survivorship information assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
General health assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Health behaviors assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Health care utilization assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Medications assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Mood and worries assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Musculoskeletal symptoms assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Neuropathy assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Post-traumatic stress assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Quality of life assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Reclassification of subject from high need to low need
Reclassification of subject from high need to low need is defined as the high need subject no longer has scores above the cut-off level on 2 or more symptoms scales (depression, distress, insomnia, fatigue, pain) assessed using the PRO survey. The 5 symptom scales are categorized based on the following cut points to define "high need": pain score \>= 5, fatigue score \>= 3, insomnia score of no insomnia, distress score \> 1.1, and depression score \>= 10.
Time frame: At 6 months
Reproductive health assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Sexual function assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Social support assessed using the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey
Will be examined in an exploratory manner, utilizing similar methods as those described for the primary endpoints for dichotomized versions of the outcomes, using standard cutoff values, where available.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.