The purpose of this study is to evaluate bioinduction of new tissue and tendon healing after implantation of the Rotation Medical Bioinductive Implant used as either a standalone device or adjunct to surgical repair in the treatment of supraspinatus tendon tears.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
148
Surgical repair with commercially-available sutures/suture anchors.
Southern California Orthopedic Institute
Van Nuys, California, United States
Steadman Hawkins Clinic-Denver
Denver, Colorado, United States
Change in Tendon Thickness
The total thickness of the tendon and any newly induced tissue at the implant site were measured at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Measurements were compared to pre-operative (baseline) supraspinatus tendon thickness to calculate the mean (± SD) change in post-operative supraspinatus tendon thickness by partial-thickness tear size (Intermediate or High) or full thickness tear size (Medium or Large).
Time frame: Pre-operatively (baseline) to 3 month, 1 year, and 2 year
Integration of Induced Tissue With Underlying Tendon
Partial-thickness tears were classified as Intermediate (3-6 mm) or High (\> 6 mm) grade tears. Full thickness tears were categorized using Cofield classification as Medium (1-3 cm) or Large (3-5 cm). Integration and maturation of the newly induced tissue was assessed by MRI at each post-operative follow-up and determined by answering Yes, No, or Unable to determine to the following questions: 1. Is there a visible boundary between the collagen scaffold/new tissue and the supraspinatus tendon? 2. Is there visible evidence of a good margin between the collagen scaffold/new tissue and the deltoid? 3. Was there evidence of bursitis in the shoulder? 4. Does the new tissue resemble normal tendon tissue? 5. Does the underlying tendon resemble normal tendon tissue? 6. Is there any new defect (i.e., loss in supraspinatus tendon continuity; re-tear)?
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Fill-In of Partial Thickness Tears and Underlying Tendon Quality
For tendon defects treated by standalone use of the device (i.e., implantation without surgical repair using sutures/suture anchors), post-operative follow-up MRIs will be used to estimate the amount of defect fill-in with newly induced tissue and the quality of the filled-in tissue. In the absence of fill-in with newly induced tissue, defect progression (i.e., change in size relative to previous MRIs) will be assessed. The amount of fill-in relative to the pre-operative, baseline MRI classified as: * 0 to \<25% * 25% to \<50% * 50% to \< 75% * 75% to \< 100% * 100%
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Number of Participants With a Re-Tear
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Holy Cross Hospital Orthopedic Research Institute
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Harbin Clinic Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine Rome
Rome, Georgia, United States
OrthoIllinois, LTD
Rockford, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa Sports Medicine
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Towson Orthopaedic Associates / University of Maryland St Joseph Med Ctr
Towson, Maryland, United States
Great Lakes Orthopaedic Center
Traverse City, Michigan, United States
Twin Cities Orthopedics
Edina, Minnesota, United States
Princeton Orthopaedic Associates, P.A.
Princeton, New Jersey, United States
...and 5 more locations
Re-tear rate following rotator cuff repair assessed by MRI. Any new observable defect (i.e. loss in supraspinatus tendon continuity) will be classified as a re-tear.
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Procedure Parameters: Device Implant Time
Mean (± SD) device implant time in minutes was assessed starting at time from introduction of the guide wire instrument into the subacromial space through completion of the last staple.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Procedure Parameters: Procedure Technical Success
Procedure technical success was measured by the count of participants where the device was successfully delivered and affixed to the target tendon location (i.e., implant of device was attempted and successful).
Time frame: Intraoperative
American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Score
The ASES consisted of subcomponent scores including pain, shoulder function, and shoulder scores as follows: 1. ASES Pain Score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain (lower score better). 2. ASES Shoulder Function Score ranges from 0 to 30, with 0 being no function and 30 being full function (higher score better). 3. ASES Shoulder Score ranges from 10 to 100, with 0 being no function and 100 being normal function (higher score better). Scores were collected at baseline and each successive follow-up visits (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, and 2 years
Constant-Murley Shoulder (CMS) Score
The overall CMS shoulder score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being severe restrictions and 100 being no restrictions (i.e., higher score is better). Scores were collected a baseline and each subsequent follow-up (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Recovery: Sling Time
Cumulative number of days index shoulder was in a sling.
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Recovery: Rehabilitation Time
Cumulative number of completed rehabilitation or physical therapy (PT) visits in days to treat index shoulder.
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Recovery: Return to Work
Cumulative number of days between discharge and return to work (employed subjects only).
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Recovery: Return to Normal Daily Activities
Return to normal daily activities (i.e. full, unrestricted activity) determined by the cumulative number of days between discharge and return to normal daily activity.
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Participant Satisfaction
Self-reported measure of the level of satisfaction with the surgical outcome of the index surgery on 5-point Likert scale where participants were asked to indicated the best response to being satisfied with the outcome of the study procedure from one of the following: * Strongly Disagree * Disagree * Neither Agree or Disagree * Agree * Strongly Agree "Strongly Disagree" indicated the lowest level of satisfaction and "Strongly Agree" indicated the greatest level of satisfaction.
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years