The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of molecular imaging using FDG-PET/CT could prevent unnecessary diagnostic thyroid surgery in case of indeterminate cytology during fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Rationale: Only about ¼ of patients with thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology are proven to suffer from a malignancy at diagnostic hemithyroidectomy. Therefore \~¾ is operated upon unbeneficially. Recent studies using FDG-PET/CT have suggested that it can decrease the fraction of unbeneficial procedures from \~73% to \~40%. Thereby the direct costs per patient, the number of hospitalization and average sick leave days might decrease and the experienced HRQoL might increase. A study will be undertaken to show the additional value of FDG-PET/CT after indeterminate cytology with respect to unbeneficial procedures, costs and utilities. Main objective: To determine the impact of FDG-PET/CT on decreasing the fraction of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules undergoing unbeneficial patient management. Study design: A prospective, multicentre, randomized, stratified controlled blinded trial with an experimental study-arm (FDG-PET/CT-driven) and a control study-arm (diagnostic hemithyroidectomy, independent of FDG-PET/CT-result). Study population: Adult patients with a cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodule, without exclusion criteria, in 15 (university and regional) hospitals distributed over the Netherlands. Intervention: One single FDG-PET/low-dose non-contrast enhanced CT of the head and neck is performed in all patients. Patient management depends on allocation and results of this FDG-PET/CT. Main study parameters/endpoints: The number of unbeneficial interventions, i.e. surgery for benign disease or watchful-waiting for malignancy. Secondary objectives: complication rate, consequences of incidental PET-findings, number of hospitalisation and sick leave days, volumes of healthcare consumed, experienced health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), genetic, cytological and (immuno)histopathological features of the nodules. Sample size calculation/data analysis: Based on above-mentioned estimated reduction in unbeneficial interventions from \~73% to \~40%, at least 90 patients with nodules\>10 mm need to be analyzed (2:1 allocation, α=0.05, power=0.90, single-sided Fisher's exact test). After correction for nodule size and data-attrition, 132 patients need to be included in total. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. Incremental Net Monetary Benefit based on the total direct costs per patients and the gain in HRQoL-adjusted survival years are computed. Cytological, histological and genetic parameters for FDG-avidity will be described. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All patients undergo one FDG-PET/CT scan of head/neck (effective dose: \<3.5 mSv) and are asked to fill in 6 questionnaires at 4 timepoints. FDG-PET/CT negative patients in the experimental arm will undergo a single confirmatory US (±FNAC). An interim/posterior analysis of the control subjects is performed to ensure oncological safety. In case of an unexpected high false-negative ratio in this control arm, all patients will be advised to undergo surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
132
Diagnostic Thyroid Surgery
Confirmatory Neck Ultrasonography in FDG-PET/CT negative patient in the experimental arm
Head and Neck FDG-PET/CT
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
MUMC
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
AMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Fraction of unbeneficial treatment
Unbeneficial treatment is defined as either: * surgery in benign disease * watchful waiting in malignant disease benign or malignant disease is defined on final histology (after surgery) or 12 month follow-up including confirmatory neck ultrasonography. This parameter is compared between both study arms based on intention-to-treat.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Fraction Complications
SO1b: To determine the effect of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT on the complication-ratio.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Fraction False-Negative FDG-PET/CT's
SO1c: To determine the false-negative fraction of FDG-PET/CT in this population.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Lesion and Patient Characteristics
SO1d: To determine the influence of lesion size, pathological classification and patient characteristics on the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Fraction Incidental FDG-PET/CT Findings
SO1e: To determine whether incorporation of FDG-PET/CT of the head and neck lead to overdiagnosis in non-thyroidal incidental findings.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Overall and Disease Free Survival
SO1f: To determine the short-term overall and disease free survival in both study arms.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
FDG-PET/CT Implementation-hampering Factors
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
VUmc
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
LUMC
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
ErasmusMC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
MeanderMC
Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf Ziekenhuis
Delft, Netherlands
...and 5 more locations
SO1g: To determine which factors hamper implementation of this modality for this indication (structured interviews).
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Fraction of Patients being operated despite negative FDG-PET/CT
SO1h: To determine the fraction of patients that cannot be reassured by a negative PET-scan (experimental arm only) despite careful selection of patients (implementability).
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
HRQoL-scores according to SF36-II, EQ-5D-5L, SF-HLQ and ThyPRO including changes
SO2a: To determine the impact on the experienced HRQoL between the group with and without FDG-PET/CT according to 4 different questionnaires at 4 timepoints during the first 12 months after FDG-PET/CT. SO2b: To determine whether patients in the experimental arm with negative PET-findings have a different HRQoL than those who receive surgery independent of the FDG-PET/CT results.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after inclusion
Direct Costs
SO3a: To determine the effect of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT on the mean direct costs (=volume of care multiplied by activity based costs) per patient during the first 12 months after FDG-PET/CT.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Number of Hospitalisation Days
SO3b: To determine the effect of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT on the average length of hospital stay for treatment of (complications of) thyroid lesions?
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Number of Sick Leave Days
SO3c: To determine the total number of sick leave days for the first three months in the patients? Do these differ between both study arms?
Time frame: 3 months after inclusions
incremental Net Monetary Benefit
SO3d: To determine the incremental Net Monetary Benefit of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT with respect to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs, based on EQ-5D-5L index and overall survival) saved including sensitivity analysis. SO3e: To determine the incremental Net Monetary Benefit of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT with respect to decrease in unbeneficial treatment. Sensitivity analysis will be performed. A mere description will be given as there is no "accepted" value for this kind of analysis.
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion
Tissue Protein- and Gene-expression profile
SO4a: Are there potential protein- or gene-expression profiles, capable of determining the nature of the FNAC-indeterminate nodes (cytology) SO4b: What is the interaction/correlation between the parameters mentioned in SO4a and the results of the FDG-PET/CT scan and the final diagnosis?
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion of last patient
Molecular biomarkers in relation to FDG-PET/CT
SO4b: What is the interaction/correlation between the parameters mentioned in SO4a and the results of the FDG-PET/CT scan and the final diagnosis? * Can these tissue molecular biomarkers help in selecting the patients that benefit most from FDG-PET, or vice versa? * Can higher pre-operative diagnostic accuracy be achieved by combining FDG-PET and molecular biomarkers? * Are molecular biomarkers related to false-positive or false-negative FDG-PET/CT results?
Time frame: 12 months after inclusion of last patient