The proposed study, IFACT - Incidental Findings in Advanced Cancer Therapy, will address this research gap by examining MSK patients' attitudes, preferences, and information needs regarding incidental findings arising from tumor genomic profiling.
Part 1, the investigators will recruit 40 participants from those already enrolled in existing MSK IRB protocol #12-245 (PI: David Hyman, MD) including male and female patients who have been diagnosed with late-stage breast, colorectal, bladder, and lung cancer (some of the most common cancers in this study population). Part 2, the investigators will recruit 20 participants from those who have actually received incidental germline findings from MSK IRB protocol #12-245 Consent Part C in order to cognitively test novel survey items about their knowledge and perceived utility of their incidental findings (note that the content of these items will be derived from the data collected in Part 1)
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
Pts will participate in a 45-60-minute, one-on-one, audio-recorded interview. They will be conducted over the telephone or in person at the MSK Counseling Center. They will be conducted in accordance with a semi-structured interview guide developed by our study team of experts in clinical genetics, health psychology, \& qualitative methodology. Topics to be covered in the interview include: 1) perceived potential benefits \& harms of tumor genomic profiling; 2) interest in \& perceived benefits \& harms of incidental findings arising from tumor genomic profiling; 3) anticipated process \& needs for decision-making about learning incidental findings; 4) interest in learning specific kinds of incidental findings (including those related to treatable diseases, different cancers, non-treatable diseases, \& those that only have meaning for family members); 5) preferences about sharing incidental findings with other people; \& 6) implications of \& concerns about incidental findings for family.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
qualitive data
The study team will review and code the interview transcripts through a process of independent and collaborative thematic content analysis,(25-28) using ATLAS.ti (a qualitative data analysis software package) to facilitate the analysis process (29).
Time frame: one time
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.