OsteoAMP is a novel allograft bone graft substitute (BGS) that has been processed to retain multiple endogenous growth factors for use in spinal fusion. The study is designed to obtain a higher level of clinical evidence for OsteoAMP in spinal fusion procedures and not to garner FDA regulatory approval. This is a prospective, non-randomized, non-controlled, multi-center study of OsteoAMP in instrumented, posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in patients with degenerative disc disease, degenerative spondylolisthesis (up to grade 1), and/or mild degenerative scoliosis, up to 25 degree curvature. Patients that are scheduled to undergo instrumented, posterolateral spinal fusion surgery as part of their medical treatment and comply with the study eligibility criteria will be given the opportunity to consent and be entered into the study.
The objective of this clinical study are: to evaluate the long term efficacy of OsteoAMP in patients requiring 1 to 2 adjacent level, instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion procedure of the lumbar or lumbosacral spine, and to evaluate OsteoAMP in spinal fusion procedures based on fusion results, adverse event rates, and pain and health scores. Patients that are scheduled to undergo instrumented, posterolateral spinal fusion (PLF) surgery as part of their medical treatment and comply with the study eligibility criteria will be recruited and entered into the study. Subjects recruited into the study will receive OsteoAMP as part of an instrumented PLF surgical procedure. The surgery may also include nerve root decompressions through laminectomies and foraminotomies. As is consistent with the current standard of care. The study involves consecutive patients suffering from lower back and leg pain due to degenerative disc disease (DDD), degenerative spondylolisthesis (up to grade 1), and/or mild degenerative scoliosis that are candidates for an instrumented PLF with pedicle screws in 1 or 2 motion segments of the lumbar or lumbosacral spine. Patients will require a total bone graft volume of at least 10cc per side per level in the PLF procedure, including OsteoAMP granules hydrated with bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and local autogenous bone. Subjects will be followed for 24 months post-surgery.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
42
OsteoAMP in posterolateral fusion procedure of the lumbosacral spine
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Kansas University Medical School
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Orthopedic Institute of Western KY
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
William Beaumont
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
The Rothman Institute
Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States
OrthoCarolina Research Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
St. Luke's University Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Posterolateral fusion evaluation as determined by physician's assessment
Radiographic evidence of fusion assessed by flexion-extension and CT radiograph or computed tomography (CT) scans. * Flexion extension radiographs timeframe: Pre-op, 6 month, 12 month, 24 months * CT timeframe: 12 month, 24 month. NOTE: If subject determined to be fused at 12 months, 24 month x-rays and CT not required
Time frame: 24 month follow up
Improvement form baseline low back pain
Improvement form baseline in low back pain and function as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: 24 month follow up
Improvements in pain
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) improvement from baseline to 24 month follow up assessed at timeframes: Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month
Time frame: 24 month follow up
Improvements in function
Short Form 36 (SF-36) score improvement compared to baseline at 24 months assessed at timeframes: Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month
Time frame: 24 month follow up
Posterolateral fusion as determined by independently scored and adjudicated assessment
Radiographic evidence of fusion assessed by flexion-extension and CT at 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: 24 month follow up
Improvements in Other Health-Related Quality of Life measures
Health-Related Quality of Life measures; work status, use of medication and perception of treatment effectiveness at Weeks 6 Post- Surgery, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: 24 month follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.