The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical outcomes of two commonly used, FDA-approved biologic meshes in hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction (Strattice and XenMatrix). The two meshes are derived from pig skin from which cells have been removed and which have been sterilized. The two meshes are made by two different companies using different processes.
This is a prospective, randomized-controlled trial comparing two porcine acellular matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction. It is single-blind (patients are blinded to the type of mesh used while surgeons are not). Our goals in this study are: 1. PRIMARY OUTCOME: To compare the overall complication rates between two non-cross-linked porcine dermal matrices (XenMatrix and Strattice) at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively 2. SECONDARY OUTCOMES i. To compare the rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) between XenMatrix and Strattice in abdominal wall reconstruction at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively 1. Infection 2. Seroma 3. Hematoma 4. Wound dehiscence 5. Skin necrosis 6. Formation of enterocutaneous fistula 7. Mesh infection ii. To compare the hernia recurrence rate between XenMatrix and Strattice at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively iii. To compare the bulge rate between XenMatrix and Strattice at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively iv. To compare to changes in patient pain, physical functioning and quality of life after hernia repair between XenMatrix and Strattice, preoperatively, and at 1 year postoperatively A. Pain assessment: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity survey, PROMIS Pain Interference survey B. Physical functioning assessment: PROMIS Physical Function C. Quality of life assessment: Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life (HerQLes) survey
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
46
Abdominal wall reconstruction using Strattice
Assess patient pain intensity preoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess pain interference preoperatively using the PROMIS pain interference survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) at 6 Week
Compare the rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) between XenMatrix and Strattice in abdominal wall reconstruction at 1 year postoperatively. These include: 1. Infection 2. Seroma 3. Hematoma 4. Wound dehiscence 5. Skin necrosis 6. Formation of enterocutaneous fistula 7. Mesh infection
Time frame: 6 week postoperatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Assess physical functioning preoperatively using the PROMIS physical functioning survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess patient quality of life preoperatively, using the HerQLes survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess patient pain intensity at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey
Assess pain interference at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Interference survey
Assess physical functioning at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Physical Functioning Survey
Assess quality of life at 1 year postoperatively using the HerQLes survey
Assess hernia recurrence at 30 days
Assess bulge at 30 days
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 30 days
Assess hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively
Assess bulge at 1 year postoperatively
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 1 year postoperatively
Abdominal wall reconstruction with XenMatrix
Strattice mesh
Xenmatrix mesh