The purpose of this study is to test whether a mouthwash made with a drug called doxepin can reduce the pain caused by mouth sores resulting from radiation therapy. A number of mouth rinse preparations exist for patients with treatment-related oral mucositis pain such as the DLA rinse, an over-the-counter medication. This study will evaluate the effects of doxepin compared to DLA (diphenhydramine, lidocaine and antacids) and placebo.Doxepin is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of depression, anxiety, long-term pain management, as well as management of rash.
Patients are stratified according to sex (male vs. female), concurrent use of chemotherapy (no vs. yes), patient age at registration (\< 60 years old vs. ≥ 60 years old and RTOG acute radiation morbidity criteria (1 vs. 2 vs 3 or more). Protocol therapy will consist of 2 cycles. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment regimens, which include doxepin, DLA and placebo. Cycle One will consist of one day. The care provider or nurse will confirm that the oral pain is at least 4 out of 10 severity level at the time of the rinse on the first day of the study. Patient will be asked to complete the baseline evaluation in the Oral Symptoms booklet. If the pain score is less than 4 then administration will be delayed until the pain is at least 4. Cycle Two will consist of an optional continuation phase lasting up to 7 days. Initiation of the Cycle 2/Continuation Phase may be delayed up to one week after Cycle 1/Day 1. Primary Objective: 1\. Determine whether the doxepin rinse or DLA rinse is more effective than placebo in reducing OM-related pain in patients undergoing RT to the oral cavity, as measured by a patient-reported questionnaire at baseline, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours. Secondary Objectives: 1. Assess the adverse event profile of the doxepin rinse, the DLA rinse agent, and the placebo using a patient-reported questionnaire at 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours for domains of unpleasant taste, burning or stinging discomfort, and drowsiness. 2. Compare the incidence of using additional analgesics between 1 and 4 hours after the initial mouthwash, between the doxepin oral rinse, the DLA rinse agent, and the placebo arms. 3. Compare the length of time that each study product is used by patients in the one-week continuation phase. 4. Compare the daily pain scores in the one-week continuation phase for the three study arms. 5. Compare the 24-hour morphine equivalent dose used in the continuation phase for the three study arms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
275
2.5 mL (25 mg) doxepin and 2.5 mL water administered orally
5.0 mL administered orally
2.5 mL placebo and 2.5 mL water administered orally
Anchorage Radiation Therapy Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Regional Hospital
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Pain Reduction
Total pain reduction (mouth and throat) was measured by the numerical analogue scale of mouth pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain in the questionnaires taken at baseline, and 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total pain reduction was calculated by the (average of mouth and throat) area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for baseline, with time scale (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing baseline data, or only provided baseline data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Unpleasant Taste of the Oral Rinse
Total unpleasant taste was measured by the numerical analogue scale of taste of the oral rinse on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=acceptable and 10=terrible in the questionnaires taken at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total unpleasant taste was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for 5 minutes post treatment, with time scale (5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing 5 minutes after treatment data, or only provided 5 minutes after treatment data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Stinging or Burning From the Oral Rinse
Total stinging or burning was measured by the numerical analogue scale of stinging or burning from the oral rinse on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no stinging or burning and 10=worst stinging or burning possible in the questionnaires taken at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total stinging or burning was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for 5 minutes post treatment, with time scale (5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing 5 minutes after treatment data, or only provided 5 minutes after treatment data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Drowsiness
Total drowsiness was measured by the numerical analogue scale of drowsiness on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no drowsiness and 10=extreme drowsiness, leading to sleep in the questionnaires taken at baseline, and 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total drowsiness was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for baseline, with time scale (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing baseline data, or only provided baseline data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
The Incidence of Using Alternative Analgesics
Patients were asked if they have taken any other pain medications, if yes, to record the name, strength and when they have taken the pain medications in the 120 minutes and 240 minutes post treatment questionnaires.
Time frame: At 120 and 240 minutes post treatment
Patient Preference for Continued Therapy With Oral Rinse After Initial Test Rinse Phase
Patients were asked: "Based on your experience with this current oral rinsing medication, would you want to take another dose now if it were available?" in the 240 minutes post treatment questionnaire.
Time frame: At 240 minutes post treatment
Frequency of Study Rinse Used in the Continuation Phase
Patients were asked: "Did you use the study rinse today?" daily questionnaire during the optional continuation phase (Cycle 2).
Time frame: Up to 7 days.
Median Mouth Pain Score in the Continuation Phase
Mouth pain scores was measured using the numerical analogue scale ranging from scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain daily during the optional continuation phase (Cycle 2).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7 in the Continuation Phase
The Incidence of Using Alternative Analgesics in the Continuation Phase
Patients were asked if they have taken any medications for pain over the past 24 hours, if yes, to record the name, strength and when they have taken the pain medications daily during the optional continuation phase (Cycle 2).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7 in the Continuation Phase
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Anchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Katmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Providence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center/Disney Family Cancer Center
Burbank, California, United States
Epic Care-Dublin
Dublin, California, United States
...and 340 more locations