The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of IX-01 in men with lifelong premature ejaculation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
88
San Diego Sexual Medicine
San Diego, California, United States
South Florida Medical Research Inc.
Aventura, Florida, United States
Center for Marital and Sexual Health of South Florida
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)
IX-01 versus placebo. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale
7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better(2) or much better (3)\] on this 7 point scale
Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)
Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred. Outcome measured proportion of patients with at least a 2.5-fold increase in geometric mean IELT over the last 4 weeks of treatment as compared to baseline. Proportion of participants adjusted for baseline IELT, country and site
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time)
IX-01 versus placebo
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer) scored as 0 to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Tulane University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Cooper Research Institute
Camden, New Jersey, United States
Manhattan Medical Research
New York, New York, United States
Urologic Consultants of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States
Miriam Hospital / The Men's Health Center
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Australian Centre for Sexual Health
Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Keogh Institute for Medical Research
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress
Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worse answer) to 4 (best answer).
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Each of the PEP questions is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment
'Baseline' time period defined as Day -28 - Day 0. 'Last 4 Weeks' time period defined as the 28 days prior to last time subject took study drug and after Day 14. Analysis excludes two subjects from ITT population: #010-012 (placebo) and #888-018 (active). Adjusted for treatment, baseline IELT, baseline percentage, country and site.
Time frame: Baseline to last 4 weeks on treatment
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event
Time frame: Start of Treatment to end of study (approximately 10 weeks)