The investigators propose a randomized, single blinded controlled trial to compare the use of synthetic versus biologic mesh in hiatal hernia repair, two currently accepted standard of care surgical modalities. The investigators hypothesize that use of synthetic mesh will have lower recurrence at these time points compared to use of biologic mesh.
Patients will be randomized to either a synthetic (light weight synthetic or biologic (small intestinal submucosa ) mesh group. Endpoints will be measured up to 5 years for the study as a whole, at 6 months and at 60 months. Prior to and following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, patients will be followed with both subjective and objective measures. Subjective evaluation will include symptomatic/quality of life assessment at 1-, 6-, 24-, and 60- month periods; objective evaluation will include Upper GI study /pH probe study for symptomatic patients and for all patients at 6 and 60 months. The investigators hypothesize that use of synthetic mesh will have lower recurrence at these time points compared to use of biologic mesh.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
312
Parietex™ Composite Hiatal Mesh (North Haven, CT) designed for hiatal hernia repair.
Biodesign™ Surgisis® Graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington) designed for hiatal hernia repair.
Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, United States
RECRUITINGAssess for reappearance of hiatal hernia and reflux
Change at 6 and 60 months will be assessed by pH and Upper GI (endoscopy) studies to assess for reappearance of hiatal hernia and reflux.
Time frame: 6 months, 60 months
Quality of Life questionnaire
Quality of life questionnaire containing 36 questions
Time frame: Quality of Life will be assessed at these time periods after the hernia repair 1, 6, 24, and 60 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.