Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a slow-growing, locally invasive malignant epidermal skin tumour. It is the most common malignant disease in Caucasians, representing approximately 80% of all cases of skin cancer and is therefore an important health problem. In the Netherlands incidence rates are 165 for men and 157 for women per 100.000 person-years, and these rates are rising with 3-10% every year. A simplified histological classification of BCCs includes the following three subtypes: nodular, superficial and infiltrative variants, with the nodular variant being the most frequent type. Although a characteristic feature of BCCs is their low risk to metastasize, if untreated they may be locally invasive and may induce considerable functional and cosmetic morbidity. The gold standard treatment of all histological BCC subtypes is surgical excision (SE), but not all patients are eligible for surgery. In patients with multiple BCCs and older patients, surgery may lead to significant morbidity, and in some cases, it may result in disfiguring scarring. For these reasons and to reduce workload and costs in the healthcare system, there is a growing demand for alternative, non-invasive, treatments. An advantage of non-invasive treatment options is that they can be performed by other healthcare professionals, such as general practitioners and specialized nurses. For treatment of superficial BCCs (sBCC) non-invasive treatments, such as topical imiquimod (IMQ), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or photodynamic therapy (PDT) are already commonly used. Our group investigated the efficacy of those three therapies and found that after 3 years, BCCs treated with IMQ had a significant lower risk of recurrence, compared to the other therapies. A recent study suggests that IMQ, besides being an immune-response modifier, also directly inhibits sonic hedgehog (SHH) signalling, the most important pathway active in BCCs. This targeted effect of IMQ very likely explains the superior therapeutic effect. Treatment of nodular BCC (nBCC) with IMQ has been investigated. Without prior curettage, high efficacy rates were found, although efficacy was still slightly inferior to SE. The investigators hypothesize that the effectiveness of IMQ following prior curettage will not be inferior to SE and that the benefits will be a higher patient satisfaction and lower healthcare costs. A recently published discreet choice experiment showed that patients preferred IMQ to surgery regardless of previous experience of BCC symptoms and treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
145
Maastricht University medical Centre
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Proportion of participants tumour-free
The primary study endpoint is the proportion of participants tumour-free at 1 year after end of treatment (defined as absence of initial treatment failure or any clinical signs of local recurrence). For SE, routine histological examination of haematoxylin and eosin (H\&E)-stained sections of the lateral and deep margins will be used to assess treatment failure. For curettage \& IMQ 5% cream, initial treatment failure will be clinically assessed at a follow-up visit 3 months after end of treatment. Initial treatment failure or any clinical signs of subsequent local recurrence will be assessed and recorded separately by one investigator. In case there is clinical suspicion of BCC, a 3 mm punch biopsy will be taken for histological verification.
Time frame: At 1 year after end of treatment
The 5-year cumulative probability of recurrence free survival after end of treatment
Any clinical signs of subsequent local recurrence will be assessed by one investigator. In case there is clinical suspicion of BCC, a 3 mm punch biopsy will be taken for histological verification.
Time frame: At 5 years after end of treatment
Compliance
Data for compliance with the prescribed regimens of IMQ 5% cream will be obtained from a personal diary kept by patients and completed daily during the six week IMQ 5% application period in subjects allocated to treatment with IMQ. Compliance will be calculated as the number of applications actually applied by the patient divided by the total prescribed number of cream applications. Furthermore sachets will be collected and counted by the investigator. This is a separate compliance assessment. The number of returned sachets will be divided by the total prescribed number of sachets. During the phone consultation by the investigator two weeks after start of application, treatment will be evaluated to ensure continuation of treatment.
Time frame: At 3 months after end of treatment
Cosmetic appearance
Cosmetic appearance of lesion site will be assessed independently by the participant and two independent investigators at 1 and 5 year follow-up using a Dutch four point scale and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
Time frame: At 1 and 5 year after end of treatment
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be assessed by the participant at 1 and 5 year follow-up on the basis of 3 statements. For the extent of agreement a 4-point rating scale is used, ranging from total disagreement to total agreement
Time frame: At 1 and 5 year after end of treatment
Level of Pain
The proportion of patients experiencing a moderate or more severe level of pain. In the IMQ 5 % group, this will be measured daily during the application period and 2 weeks after end of treatment. In the SE group, pain during SE procedure will be measured and pain until the removal of the stiches will be measured daily. Furthermore pain will be measured at the time of removal of the stiches. Pain will be assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents, 'most severe pain imaginable'.
Time frame: 2 weeks after end of treatment
Cost-effectiveness
Data regarding resource use, i.e. outpatient visits, phone consultation, curettage, IMQ cream, SE and potential treatment of side-effects/adverse events will be recorded during the trial. Cost-prices will be derived from the manual for cost research in economic evaluations, the Pharmacotherapeutic Compass and the university hospital Maastricht. If necessary, cost-prices will be calculated based on real resource use. Total treatment costs will be estimated by multiplying volumes of use with the costs per unit. The cost-effectiveness ratio will be expressed as the incremental costs per additional tumour free patient. To quantify the uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) bootstrap analysis will be performed. Results of this analysis will be presented in cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves.
Time frame: At 5 year after end of treatment
Adverse events
Adverse events, including local skin reactions, will be collected from all patients up to the 3 months follow-up visit and during phone consultation by the investigator (after two weeks of treatment in the IMQ group and during phone consultation about the histological examination of the excision specimen in the SE group). In case of an extra (phone) consultation of the patients as a result of severe adverse reactions, this will also be recorded. Serious events related to the investigative treatments (SUSAR) will be recorded during the entire follow-up period.
Time frame: Up to 3 months after end of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.