A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Low-volume Bowel Preparation Methods

Korea University Anam Hospital200 enrolled

Overview

Colonoscopy is a common screening method to detect polyps and CRC. With the early detection of CRC through screening colonoscopy, patients could have better therapeutic effects and outcomes. In population screening programs, an increase in completed colonoscopies is related to a decrease in mortality from CRC. However, the miss rate for detecting colorectal neoplastic polyps of colonoscopy is 5-28%. The reluctance of participants to undergo bowel preparation results in the relatively low rate of detection of polyps and CRC, because poor preparation interferes with successful colon mucosa examination during a colonoscopy. Low-volume bowel preparations provide equivalent cleansing effect compared with standard 4 liter polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the superiority between low-volume bowel preparations are rare, and results are controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.

1. Study design: endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial 2. Subjects 1. Entry criteria: Male or female patients, aged between18 and 80 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study. 2. Exclusion criteria: patients who had chronic kidney disease, severe heart failure(New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV), uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic pressure ≥100 mm Hg), severe constipation, any bowel resection, significant gastroparesis, or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation. 3. Sampling design: Consecutive recruitment of consenting patients 4. Variables Predictor 1. group 1 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure 2. group 2 (PEG-Asc) received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure; 5. Primary Outcome: Quality of bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, Aronchick scale, bubble score) 6. Secondary Outcome: Tolerability, palatability

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients, aged between18 and 80 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study Exclusion Criteria: * patients who had chronic kidney disease, severe heart failure(New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV), uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic pressure ≥100 mm Hg), severe constipation, any bowel resection, significant gastroparesis, or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

the quality of the bowel preparation using Preparation Scale

Preparation Scale

Time frame: 20 minutes

Secondary Outcomes

Completeness of the bowel preparation

Patient compliance was recorded by checking the completeness of the prescribed preparation methods including bowel cleansing agent solution and recommended clear liquid.

Time frame: 30 minutes before the colonoscopy

the patient's tolerability

Patients were asked with questionnaires about the symptoms associated with the preparation to assess the patients' tolerability before the colonoscopy. Patients were asked whether they experienced any of the following : abdominal fullness, cramping, nausea, vomiting, sleep disturbance, and overall discomfort, and these symptoms were scored on a 5-point scale where 1 = "none", 2 = "mild", 3 = "moderate", 4 = "severe", and 5 = "very severe".