The main hypothesis of this study is to demonstrate that the use of the ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer test in previously biopsied patients improves urologists' patient management by reducing unnecessary repeat biopsies, attendant procedure costs, and potential adverse events in men being considered for a repeat procedure.
The results of the study will reveal the clinical utility of this test by analyzing the physicians' use of negative or positive assays compared to patients managed using SOC methods without assay findings. The repeat biopsy rate at 12 months from study entry will be used for the primary endpoint analysis. All patients will be followed for 24 months from the date of the previous negative biopsy to evaluate an extended period of observation to track repeat biopsies and cancer detection. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate a lower repeat biopsy rate by using the negative results of ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer in practice rather than current SOC. All patients will have the tissue from their previous negative biopsy tested with the assay. Only data from Cases (informed of ConfirmMDx assay results) and Controls (blinded of the ConfirmMDx assay result) patients with negative test results will be used for the primary objective.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
600
Urology Centers of Alabama
Homewood, Alabama, United States
Genesis Research LLC
San Diego, California, United States
Skyline Urology
The primary objective is to demonstrate the clinical utility of the ConfirmMDx test
The primary objective is to demonstrate a lower repeat biopsy rate by using the negative results of ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer in practice rather than current SOC.
Time frame: 2 years
Compare rebiopsy rates assay negative results in cases and controls
Comparison of rebiopsy rates of Cases and Controls with assay negative results at the end of follow up of 24 months from the date of the previous biopsy.
Time frame: 2 years
Compare rebiopsy rates in assay positive group vs standard of care
Comparison of rebiopsy rates in assay positive results group vs. SOC (blinded) positive assay group.
Time frame: 2 years
Compare rebiopsy rates of case and controls
Comparison of overall rates of rebiopsies of the entire Case vs. Control Cohorts
Time frame: 2 years
Analyse cancer detection rates
Analysis of cancer detection rates in ConfirmMDx positive and negative arms versus those of Controls
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluate clinical utility and cost savings by using the ConfirmMDx test
Evaluate clinical resource utilization, medical complications, and cost impact across groups
Time frame: 2 years
Compare rebiopsy rates assay positive results in cases and controls
Evaluate prostate cancer detection rates after repeat biopsy in the Case and Controls positive and negative groups at the end of 24 months after the previous negative biopsy date.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Torrance, California, United States
Urology Center of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, United States
First Urology, PSC
Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States
Regional Urology, LLC
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
Towson, Maryland, United States
Michigan Institute of Urology
Troy, Michigan, United States
Associated Medical Professionals of NY
Syracuse, New York, United States
Oregon Urology Institute
Springfield, Oregon, United States
...and 5 more locations
Time frame: 2 years