Assess sensitivity and specificity of two nucleic acid amplification tests, namely Epistem Genedrive® and MolbioTruenat™ in raw sputum compared to the WHO-endorsed GeneXpert® MTB/RIF assay using a gold standard of four cultures
* Estimate the accuracy of the Epistem Genedrive® and MolbioTruenat™ in raw sputum and in sputum pellets. * Assess the operational feasibility of Epistem Genedrive® and MolbioTruenat™ * Determine and compare costs between the Epistem Genedrive®, MolbioTruenat™, and Xpert MTB/RIF tests
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
504
S1 will undergo direct smear and Epistem Genedrive® (optional for phase 2\*) testing, before being homogenized with glass beads and split into three portions for testing with Epistem Genedrive®, MolBio Truenat™ and GeneXpert MTB/Rif® respectively. S2 and S3 will be randomized as to the order of testing using Epistem Genedrive® and MolBio Truenat™.
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Non-inferiority of tests
Non-inferiority of Epistem Genedrive® MTB iD Test and MolBio Truenat™ TB Assay to GeneXpert MTB/RIF using a non-inferiority margin of 5% for sensitivity in smear-positive, culture-positive; 7% for overall C+ sensitivity; and 3% for specificity in smear-negative, culture-negatives
Time frame: 4 months
Sensitivity and specificity of Epistem Genedrive® MTB iD
Sensitivity and specificity of Epistem Genedrive® MTB iD Test on raw sputum before homogenization, homogenized raw sputum and sputum pellet against a gold standard of concentrated smear and four cultures.
Time frame: 4 months
Sensitivity and specificity of MolBio Truenat™ TB Assay
Sensitivity and specificity of MolBio Truenat™ TB Assay on homogenized raw sputum and sputum pellet against a gold standard of concentrated smear and four cultures.
Time frame: 4 months
Failure rate for the Epistem Genedrive® system assay and for the MolBio Truenat™ assay
Failure rate for the Epistem Genedrive® system assay and for the MolBio Truenat™ assay, expressed as the proportion of tests that require repeating due to an indeterminate or uninterpretable initial result (separately and together for tests performed on raw sputum and sputum pellet
Time frame: 10 months
Training needs for each assay
Training needs for each assay assessed objectively by number of hours of training, number of runs required, and successful completion of a proficiency assessment by trainees; training needs also will be assessed subjectively by the trainers and by user questionnaires
Time frame: 10 months
Operational feasibility
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Operational feasibility will be assessed according to the infrastructure required to support each test, the robustness of the reagents and equipment (any breakdowns, storage requirements or contamination events), and the time it takes to run each test;
Time frame: 10 months
Cost-comparison between assays
A cost-comparison between assays assessing the cost per sample run incorporating all costs involved in transport, equipment, reagents, personnel, etc. will be performed.
Time frame: 10 months