This study is designed to help the investigators understand more about how people plan for their future medical needs, a process known as "advance care planning." The study is under the direction of Michael J. Green, M.D., and Benjamin Levi, M.D. physicians at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. Participation in the project takes place during a single visit to the Medical Center campus. During this one-to-three hour visit, participants complete several questionnaires and use a computer program that produces a printed advance directive that can be shared with their physicians and loved ones. Participants will receive compensation toward travel expenses.
Background: Despite widespread agreement that individuals ought to plan for their medical futures, few people (even seriously ill patients with cancer) actually complete advance directives, fewer yet understand key elements, and even when advance directives do exist, there are often barriers to their being implemented. Objectives: The investigators innovative, multimedia, interactive, computer-based decision aid, "Making Your Wishes Known: Planning Your Medical Future," offers tailored education, values clarification exercises, and a sophisticated decision aid that translates an individual's goals and preferences into a specific medical plan that can be implemented by a health care team. This project aims to evaluate its impact on decision-making and health care received by individuals at the end of life in a randomized clinical trial among a population of patients with advanced cancer who have life expectancies of \< 12 months. Specific Aims: Aim 1: To evaluate the impact of a computer-based advance care planning intervention on end-of-life decision-making by cancer patients with estimated life expectancies \< 12 months. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to standard care (paper/pencil living will form), use of the computer-based intervention will: H1: Improve individuals' decision-making about end-of-life health care H2: Improve individuals' experience with the process of advance care planning H3: Not increase individuals' hopelessness or anxiety, nor harm the doctor-patient relationship Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of the investigators intervention on end-of-life health care received by cancer patients with estimated life expectancies \< 12 months. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to standard care, use of the computer intervention will: H4: Increase physician awareness of individuals' health care wishes H5: Increase physician adherence to individuals' health care wishes Study Design: Randomized, controlled pre-intervention/post-intervention trial comparing a computer-based educational intervention with standard care Cancer Relevance: Patients with advanced cancer face many medical decisions, some of which must be made when the patient cannot speak for him or herself. Helping these individuals to effectively articulate and communicate their wishes, in advance, can help assure that treatment they receive is consistent with their values, goals and wishes. This study aims to test the effectiveness of the investigators' computer-based intervention. If successful, this intervention can help improve the quality of health care received by cancer patients at the end of life.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
200
Offers tailored education, values clarification exercises, and a sophisticated decision aid that translates an individual's goals and preferences into a specific medical plan that can be implemented by a health care team.
paper/pencil living will form
Participant knowledge of advance care planning
Knowledge of advance care planning will be compared between control and intervention groups, using a true/false and multiple choice questionnaire about advance care planning.
Time frame: Pre and post-intervention
Participant decisional conflict
Assessment of conflict associated with making end-of-life decisions will be assessed with the decisional conflict scale.
Time frame: post-intervention
Participant satisfaction with decision
Assessment of satisfaction with decisions associated with advance care planning will be assessed with the satisfaction with decision scale.
Time frame: post-intervention
Participant satisfaction with advance care planning
Satisfaction with with advance care planning process will be compared between intervention and control group with a satisfaction questionnaire.
Time frame: post-intervention
Participant self-determination
Self determination will be compared between intervention and control group with a self-determination questionnaire.
Time frame: pre and post-intervention
Participant anxiety
Pre and post-intervention anxiety will be compared between intervention and control group with the state trait anxiety instrument.
Time frame: pre and post-intervention
Participant hopelessness
Assessment of pre and post-intervention hopelessness will be compared between intervention and control group using the Beck Hopelessness scale and a measure of hopefulness.
Time frame: pre and post-intervention
Physician awareness of patients' health care wishes
Comparison will be made between intervention and control group regarding whether an advance directive is present in the patient's medical record, and whether the physician is aware of the patient's wishes.
Time frame: post-death chart review
Physician adherence to patients' health care wishes
Comparison will be made between intervention and control group regarding whether patients' wishes are followed at the end of life.
Time frame: post-death chart review
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.