The investigators intend to assess the impact of optimized injection technique on the evolution of clinical parameters in insulin-treated patients with diabetes (DM) who have clinical lipohypertrophy (LH) in a controlled, prospective study with a follow-up of 6 months, conducted at Ealing Hospital, West London, UK. DM patients who have LH and inject into it will be randomized to either switch to normal tissue sites with intensive education as to why and how and use of a 4mm pen needle, or to continue with standard care. The endpoints measured will include the impact on glucose control parameters, consumption of insulin, hypoglycaemia rates, use of health services resources and health care costs
This is an interventional clinical trial at Ealing Hospital (UK) in patients with DM1 and DM2 treated with insulin for at least 1 year, aged from 18 to 75 years inclusive, with a goal of 95 patients randomized to the 'LH+ Intervention' arm and 95 patients randomized to the 'LH+ Standard Care' arm. LH+ refers to the presence of clinically-confirmed LH about which there is little or no doubt as to its presence. The study takes place over 4 clinic visits, which form part of their usual clinical visits (spaced at 3-month intervals in Ealing). Each visit is described below. INTERVENTION The intervention consists of instructing patients in whom LH is detected and who are currently injecting into it to move injections to non-LH areas; reducing insulin doses initially by 10-20% to avoid hypoglycaemia and then titrating to target control; instructing these patients to correctly rotate sites (leaving 1 cm between injection punctures and allowing used sites to heal for 2-4 weeks before injecting in them again); instructing these patients to forego needle reuse; and instructing these patients to switch to 4 mmx32G needles. A battery of tools (described below) will be used to deliver and reinforce this training, including frequent contact by phone or other electronic means after the initial training. CONTROL Standard care means affording the patients randomized to the control arm the customary education and follow-up usually given at the centre. This would include appraising them of the presence of LH (if they were not previously aware) and stating that injections should not be given into that area. The training approach, tools and intensive follow-up given the Intervention arm patients will not be given to the Controls. Additionally, at their return visit (3 and 6 months), Control patients will be asked if they did indeed change their injection habits (e.g. stopped injecting into LH) since entering the study. Those who did and those who did not will be analysed separately to see if there is a difference in outcomes and both groups will be compared to the Intervention arm patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
31
The intervention consists of instructing patients in whom LH is detected and who are currently injecting into it to move injections to non-LH areas; reducing insulin doses initially by 10-20% to avoid hypoglycaemia and then titrating to target control; instructing these patients to correctly rotate sites (leaving 1 cm between injection punctures and allowing used sites to heal for 2-4 weeks before injecting in them again); instructing these patients to forego needle reuse; and instructing these patients to switch to 4 mmx32G needles. A battery of tools (described below) will be used to deliver and reinforce this training, including frequent contact by phone or other electronic means after the initial training.
Usual and customary education and training normally provided injecting patients at the center
Ealing Hospital
Middlesex, London, United Kingdom
HbA1c
The mean HbA1c from baseline to be compared to six months
Time frame: 6 months
Blood Glucose (BG) Values
Number of BG values within target range
Time frame: 6 months
Hypoglycemia Reactions
Number and severity of hypoglycemic reactions
Time frame: 6 months
Total Daily Dose (TDD) of Insulin
The mean TDD from baseline to be compared to six months
Time frame: 6 months
Health Care Costs
The mean health care costs from baseline to be compared to six months
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.