This study consists of a retrospective and a prospective part. For each part and in each of 5 clinics, one intraoperative postimplant image (lateral view) of 25 patients with pertrochanteric fractures will be assessed by 5 surgeons per clinic. There are two assessments in the retrospective part. a) before an educational intervention, b) after the educational intervention. The evaluated images at these two timepoints are identical. In the prospective part, the surgeons apply their new knowledge from the educational intervention. They perform the positioning of the patient during the intraoperative fluoroscopy and record the image according to the teaching material. One postimplant image of each patient will be used for the evaluation. At all three timepoints of image assessment, a questionnaire with the same set of 7 criteria (Q1-Q7) for assessing the radiographs is used. The criteria refer to the content of the educational material.
5 surgeons in 5 clinics will participate including a total of 125 prospective and 125 retrospective cases. This means 25+25 cases per clinic or 5+5 cases treated by each surgeon. The anonymized images of the surgeon's last 5 patients (retrospective part) and the pseudonymized images of the next 5 patients meeting the eligibility criteria (prospective part) will be assessed. Patients are eligible if they are at least 18 years old, have an AO 31-A1, A2 or A3 fracture and were treated with either a Proximal Femoral nail Antirotation (PFNA), a PFNA- II, a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or a Titanium Trochanteric Fixation Nail System (TFN). Individually, the 5 surgeons per clinic review the 25 postimplant intraoperative lateral images filed for 5 retrospective cases using a set of predefined criteria. After this first assessment of retrospective cases, the group watches a video and a poster and has one hour of time to discuss it. The group reviews the 25 cases from the pre-education step again within a period of maximum 5 days. The data are analyzed at AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation (AOCID) and provided to the surgeons for data review meeting where they agree on areas for improvement and set target goals for the prospective series. For the whole period of the second assessment and the prospective series, the poster is placed in the area of the operating room. After patient information/consent, eligible patients are included into the prospective part of the study and treated with either an intramedullary nail or a DHS. During the surgery, the surgeons use the newly achieved knowledge to record images. In the next step, the 5 surgeons per clinic review individually 25 postimplant intraoperative lateral images of 5 prospective cases using the same set of predefined criteria. The data are analyzed at AOCID and review by the Imaging Working Group of AO Education. The data are not transferred between the clinics. The main outcomes will be assessed based on the "Questionnaire for the assessment of the lateral intraoperative view of the proximal femur". This questionnaire consists of seven questions, on image quality (Q1 and Q2; part A) and on quality of reduction and surgery (Q3 - Q7; part B). Q1 and Q2 allow only "yes/no" answers, with an option to comment on the answer "no". Q3 to Q5 are based on anatomical assessments and Q6 and Q7 ask for evaluation of the surgery. There is a "not assessable" answer option for all questions of part B.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
250
Educational Intervention has been performed at the treating surgeon (video and poster). The surgeons applies the achieved knowledge when performing the intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients with pertrochanteric fractures.
University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Hospital of the Medical University Graz
Graz, Austria
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Cantonal Hospital Winterthur
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Municipal Hospital Triemli
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Image quality as determined by The proportion of "yes" answers to Q1 and Q2 in the post-educational assessment II compared to the proportion of "yes" answers to Q1 and Q2 pre-educational assessment.
Time frame: 6 months
Interrater agreement between pre-educational and post-educational assessment of image quality (Q1-Q2)
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of images that are rated as "not assessable" (Q3-Q7)
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of "Quality of reduction and surgery" criteria with the best possible assessment (yes/optimal) (Q3-Q7)
Time frame: 6 months
Interrater agreement between pre-educational and post-educational assessment of surgery's quality (Q3-Q7)
Time frame: 6 months
Surgeons' experience (years and professional level)
Time frame: 6 months
Surgeons practice (average number of hip surgeries per month)
Time frame: 6 months
Self-assessment gap score
(3 questions regarding the current and the desired level of ability in fixing pertrochanteric femoral fractures, obtaining lateral intraoperative images of the proximal femur and assessing lateral intraoperative images of the proximal femur)
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.