The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
120
Direct laryngoscopy
Optical laryngoscopy
Videolaryngoscopy
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Warsaw, Masovia, Poland
RECRUITINGTime to intubation
time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
Time frame: 1 month
Success of intubation
effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
Time frame: 1 month
POGO score
self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score
Time frame: 1 month
VAS score
participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
Time frame: 1 month
Cormack-Lehane grading
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
Time frame: 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Blind intubation