This is a 12 week study that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 11 mg tofacitinib modified release tablet taken once a day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who continue taking methotrexate. Results for the modified release tablets will be compared to the efficacy and safety of the 5 mg tofacitinib immediate release tablets taken twice a day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who continue taking methotrexate.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
209
tofacitinib modified release 11 mg tablet administered once time a day for 12 weeks
tofacitinib immediate release 5 mg tablet administered twice a day for 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4) (C-Reactive Protein [CRP]) at Week 12
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, CRP (milligrams per liter \[mg/L\]) and patient global assessment of disease activity on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \[less than or equal to\] \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (\<) 2.6 implied remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4) (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR]) at Week 12
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour \[mm/hr\]) and patient global assessment of disease activity on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 implied remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent [%] (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Participants with 20% improvement in 68-tender and 66-swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire-disability index(HAQ-DI) and CRP. Patient's global assessment of arthritis: participant assessed arthritis by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no arthritis) to 100 mm (extreme arthritis), higher score implied more arthritis. Physician global assessment of arthritis: physician judged participants arthritis by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no arthritis) to 100 mm (extreme arthritis), higher score implied more arthritis. Patient's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score implied more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
National Hospital Organization Toyohashi Medical Center
Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, Japan
Yamada Rheumatology Clinic
Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
St. Mary's Hospital
Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
Gunma Rheumatism Clinic
Takasaki-shi, Gunma, Japan
Inoue Hospital
Tohrimachi, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan
Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
National Hospital Organization Asahikawa Medical Center
Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
Katayama Orthopaedic Rheumatology Clinic
Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
...and 26 more locations
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Participants with 50% improvement in 68-tender and 66-swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire-disability index(HAQ-DI) and CRP. Patient's global assessment of arthritis: participant assessed arthritis by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no arthritis) to 100 mm (extreme arthritis), higher score implied more arthritis. Physician global assessment of arthritis: physician judged participants arthritis by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no arthritis) to 100 mm (extreme arthritis), higher score implied more arthritis. Patient's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score implied more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
Participants with 70% improvement in 68-tender and 66-swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire-disability index(HAQ-DI) and CRP. Patient's global assessment of arthritis: participant assessed arthritis by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no arthritis) to 100 mm (extreme arthritis), higher score implied more arthritis. Physician global assessment of arthritis: physician judged participants arthritis by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no arthritis) to 100 mm (extreme arthritis), higher score implied more arthritis. Patient's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score implied more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With DAS Remission (DAS28-4-CRP <2.6) at Week 12
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and patient global assessment of disease activity on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) \<2.6 implied remission. Number of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-CRP\<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With DAS Remission (DAS28-4-ESR <2.6) at Week 12
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and patient global assessment of disease activity on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 implied remission. Number of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-ESR\<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity (DAS28-4-CRP <=3.2) at Week 12
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and patient global assessment of disease activity on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) \<2.6 implied remission. Number of participants with low disease activity (DAS28-4-CRP\<=3.2) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity (DAS28-4-ESR <=3.2) at Week 12
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and patient global assessment of disease activity on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 implied remission. Number of participants with low disease activity (DAS28-4-ESR\<=3.2) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 categories of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities over past week. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving an Improvement of at Least 0.22 Units in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ Scores) at Week 12
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 categories of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities over past week. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities. Number of participants with an improvement of at least 0.22 units in HAQ scores from baseline to Week 12 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Domain Scores at Week 12
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were aggregated to derive the two component scores (physical component scores \[PCS\], mental component scores \[MCS\]) ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher scores indicated good health condition.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Component Scores at Week 12
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were aggregated to derive the two component scores PCS and MCS ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher scores indicated good health condition.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Scores at Week 12
The FACIT-Fatigue Scale was a participant completed questionnaire consisted of 13 items that assessed fatigue. Each item was scored on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), Total score ranging from 0 (not at all) to 52 (very much), higher scores represented lower level of fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Week 12
EQ-5D was a participant completed instrument designed to assess impact on quality of life in terms of a single utility score in five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression with 3 possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3=severe problems). The 5-dimensional systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 and 1, where higher score indicated a better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12