The purpose of this study is to validate in comparison to a reference method (inuline) two novel non-radioactive biomarkers for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement in chronic-kidney disease (CKD) patients and in healthy volunteers: Calcium-EDTA and Gd-DOTA.
Research on estimation and measurement of renal function has been greatly stimulated by the international concept of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its classification into stages of severity based on the level of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (National Kidney Foundation KDOQI and ANAES in 2002, KDIGO conference in 2005), and by the development of recommendations for clinical practice according to this stages. Many efforts have focused on the validation of new formula to estimate GFR from endogenous markers. Nevertheless, the performance of these formula is limited by a large inter individual variability, that requires in many cases the use of GFR measurement using exogenous tracers (extreme anthropometric characteristics, abnormal production of endogenous tracers, potential kidney donors, dose adjustment, nephrotoxicity monitoring…). The use of GFR measurement is burdened by a lack of availability due to methodological, biological and regulatory (for radioactive tracers) constraints. That's why a need exists for new validated tracers that will be more accessible and easier to use. Moreover, there are differences between the measurement techniques: single injection of the tracer or concentration equilibrium obtained by continuous infusion; plasma or urinary clearance. Two new tracers for GFR measurement are here offered for validation: Gd-DOTA and Calcium-EDTA. Gd-DOTA is a macrocyclic paramagnetic contrast product, which can be measured using an ELISA type immunoassay. Although being widely used in radiology with higher doses than those that will be used for GFR measurement in the multi-GFR study, Gd-DOTA has never been involved in systemic nephrogenic fibrosis cases (ProFinest study). Calcium-EDTA has been used for many years for the chelation of heavy metals. Recently, a colorimetric assay for Calcium-EDTA measurement has been developed. Gd-DOTA and Calcium-EDTA clearance for GFR measurement will be compared to inuline clearance in healthy volunteers (25 for each new tracer) and CKD patients (150 for each new tracer).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
166
Calcium EDTA for equilibrium GFR measurement : bolus injection 30 mg/kg, then 10 mg/min perfusion for estimated renal clearance 100 mL /min for 4 hours. Calcium EDTA for single injection GFR measurement : bolus injection depending on the estimated GFR
Gd-DOTA for equilibrium GFR measurement : bolus injection 56 ng/kg, then 28 ng/min perfusion for estimated renal clearance 100 mL /min for 4 hours. Gd-DOTA for single injection GFR measurement : bolus injection depending on the estimated GFR
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou (centre d'investigations cliniques)
Paris, France
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou (Service de Nephrologie)
Paris, France
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou (service de Physiologie et des Radioisotopes)
Paris, France
CHU Rangueil (service explorations fonctionnelles physiologiques)
Toulouse, France
Calcium EDTA and Gd-DOTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement
Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA clearance for GFR measurement is compared to inuline clearance in healthy volunteers (n= 25) and in CKD patients (n= 150, stages 1 to 4, 30 patients for each stage) at equilibrium by measuring urinary clearances of inuline and Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA continuously co-infused after a loading dose.
Time frame: 1 day
Calcium EDTA and Gd-DOTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement in each CKD stage
Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA clearance for GFR measurement is compared to inuline clearance in healthy volunteers (n= 25) and in CKD patients (n= 150, stages 1 to 4, 30 patients for each stage) at equilibrium by measuring urinary clearances of inuline and Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA continuously co-infused after a loading dose.
Time frame: 1 day
Calcium EDTA and Gd-DOTA clearance reproducibility for GFR measurement
Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA clearance is measured twice at day 1 and day 15 in healthy volunteers (n= 25) and in CKD patients (n= 25, stages 1 to 4, 5 patients for each stage) at equilibrium by measuring urinary clearances of inuline and Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA continuously co-infused after a loading dose.
Time frame: 15 days
Calcium EDTA and Gd-DOTA clearance with single injection for GFR measurement
Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA clearance is measured twice at day 1 and day 15 in healthy volunteers (n= 25) and in CKD patients (n= 25, stages 1 to 4, 5 patients for each stage) at equilibrium at day 1 by measuring urinary clearances of inuline and Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA continuously co-infused after a loading dose and at day 15 with a single loading dose of Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA
Time frame: 15 days
Volumes of distribution of Calcium EDTA and Gd-DOTA
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA apparent volumes of distribution are compared to inuline apparent volume of distribution in healthy volunteers (n= 25) and in CKD patients (n= 150, stages 1 to 4, 30 patients for each stage).
Time frame: 1 day
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety.
Each event following Calcium EDTA or Gd-DOTA infusion will be listed in healthy volunteers (n = 50) and in patients (n = 300).
Time frame: 45 days