Double Lumen Tube Intubation

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education120 enrolled

Overview

The aim of this study was to compare time, success rates of different double-lumen tubes in intubation in a standardized manikin model.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

120

Conditions

Endotracheal Intubation Cardiac Arrest

Interventions

standard double-lumen tubeDEVICE

intubation using standard double-lumen tube

VivaSight Double Lumen TubeDEVICE

intubation using VivaSight Double Lumen Tube

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 65 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * give voluntary consent to participate in the study * minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine * experienced emergency medicine personnel (physicians, nurses, paramedics) Exclusion Criteria: * not meet the above criteria * wrist or low back diseases

Locations (1)

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Success of intubation

effectiveness of first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants

Time frame: 1 day

Secondary Outcomes

Intubation time

time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt

Time frame: 1 day

Cormack-Lehane grading

self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)

Time frame: 1 day

Preferred ETI device

participants were asked which method of ETI they would prefer in a real-life.

Time frame: 1day

Central Contacts

Andrzej Kurowski

CONTACT

+48500186225 andrzejkurowski987@gmail.com

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.