A study of single-agent birabresib (MK-8628) (formerly known as OTX015) in recurrent GBM after standard front-line therapy failure. The first phase of the study (dose escalation) will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). MTD assessment will be based using dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during the first 28 days of treatment. The second phase of the study (expansion cohort) will assess efficacy as measured by the progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) as determined by an independent central review committee.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
Administered orally in a fasted state once daily.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months
Progression-free survival was the time from the start of study treatment to the date of clinical or radiographic evidence of progressive disease according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2010 criteria or death. Progression, as assessed by RANO 2010, was defined as a ≥25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions; any new lesion; or clinical deterioration. PFS at 6 months was measured as the percentage of participants who were alive and progression-free at Month 6. PFS at 6 months was calculated for all participants who were actively enrolled in the study at the 6-month time point.
Time frame: Month 6
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the number of participants in the analysis population who experienced a Complete Response (CR: complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and non-measurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; no corticosteroids; and stable or improved clinically) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥50% decrease compared with baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable enhancing lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable or reduced corticosteroid dose; and stable or improved clinically) and was assessed using RANO 2010.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was the time from the first documented CR (complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and non-measurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; no corticosteroids; and stable or improved clinically)or PR (≥50% decrease compared with baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable enhancing lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable or reduced corticosteroid dose; and stable or improved clinically), as assessed by RANO 2010, until documentation of disease progression, or the date of the last tumor assessment (if there was no documented progression), or the last tumor assessment before the start of further antitumor therapy. DOR was calculated for all participants who experienced a CR or PR.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was the time from the start of study treatment to the date of death. Participants were to be censored at their last contact if they were still alive at the cut-off date. OS was calculated for all participants who did not discontinue from the study due to disease progression.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Progression-free Survival
Progression-free survival was the time from the start of study treatment to the date of clinical or radiographic evidence of progressive disease according to RANO 2010 criteria or death. Progression, as assessed by RANO 2010, was defined as a ≥25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions; any new lesion; or clinical deterioration. PFS was measured as the number of participants who were alive and progression-free for up to 6 months.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Toxicity Grade 3-5 AE
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced ≥1 Grade 3-5 AE per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 criteria is presented. Grade 3 was classified as severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care; Grade 4 was classified as potentially life-threatening or disabling; and Grade 5 was an AE resulting in death.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
A DLT was defined as any of the following toxicities that were considered by the investigator to be related to MK-8628: Hematologic toxicity: Grade 4 hematologic toxicity or febrile neutropenia, Grade 3 neutropenia with infection, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or lasting \>7 days; Non-hematologic toxicity: Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (regardless of duration) unless it was not optimally managed with supportive care, Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormality lasting \>7 days, or intolerable Grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity resulting in study treatment discontinuation or delay \>7 days with or without dose reduction.
Time frame: Up to Cycle 1 (Up to 28 days)
Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8628
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of Cmax of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry and Cmax was calculated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software program Monolix version 4.3.2s. The Cmax of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 hours postdose
Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of MK-8628
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Tmax of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry and Tmax was calculated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software program Monolix version 4.3.2s. The Tmax of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 hours postdose
Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of MK-8628
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of t1/2 of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry and t1/2 was calculated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software program Monolix version 4.3.2s. The t1/2 of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 hours
Apparent Total Body Clearance (Cl/F) of MK-8628
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Cl/F of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry and Cl/F was calculated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software program Monolix version 4.3.2s. The Cl/F of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 hours
Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of MK-8628
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Vz/F of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry and Vz/F was calculated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software program Monolix version 4.3.2s. The Vz/F of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 hours
Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of MK-8628
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Cmin of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. A single Cmin value for MK-8628 was estimated using dose and steady-state predose concentrations of MK-8628 on Days 29 and 57. The Cmin of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Predose on Days 29 and 57
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8628 From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)
Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of AUC 0-∞ of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The AUC 0-∞ was estimated indirectly using the dose and CL/F values. The AUC 0-∞ of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.