This study will evaluate the two main types of replacement tissue heart valve used in current practice, comparing outcomes from surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with that of the more recently introduced "key-hole" procedure called transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Participants will be recruited at various time points ranging from 1 month to 10 years following valve replacement with either AVR or TAVI. It is thought that progressive calcium (chalk) formation is responsible for the failure of the majority of these valves. All participants will therefore have a PET-CT scan with a special type of "tracer" called 18F-fluoride in order to measure active calcium formation in the valve. They will then have annual clinical follow-up for 5 years and be invited back for a repeat CT scan at 2 years to measure change in calcium burden. This study aims to investigate, firstly, the effects of valve age and type on calcium formation as measured by PET-CT and, secondly, whether this measure of calcium formation can help to predict how long different types of valve will last. If successful, 18F-fluoride PET-CT could become a valuable tool for testing new treatments to improve valve longevity and new valve designs.
Aortic stenosis is the commonest form of valve disease in the western world and the leading indication for valve surgery. Bioprosthetic valves are known to degenerate via a process that is predominantly driven by calcification. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has recently emerged as a less invasive alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery. Whilst this technique holds great promise, long-term follow up data are lacking and the longevity of these valves remains to be established. In this longitudinal, cross-sectional study of 180 subjects with either surgical or transcatheter implanted bioprostheses, this study proposes to look for the earliest signs of active calcification using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (PET). During a 5 year follow-up period, this study hopes to demonstrate that 18F-fluoride PET will predict subsequent bioprosthetic valve degeneration and identify patients at risk of premature valve failure. The study also hopes that it will inform about the comparative durability of novel percutaneous valves. If successful, 18F-Fluoride could provide a useful method of assessing novel therapeutic strategies targeted at improving the longevity of bioprostheses and help to guide future valve design.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
105
Injection of 18F-Fluoride with target activity 125MBq giving an anticipated radiation exposure of 3mSv CT scanning protocol giving an anticipated radiation exposure of 13mSv
CT associated with an anticipated radiation exposure of 3mSv (Cohorts 2 and 3 only)
18F-Fluoride uptake in aortic bioprostheses
18F-Fluoride uptake expressed as tissue to background ratio (TBR) in aortic valve bioprostheses of different age and type as measured by PET/CT
Time frame: Baseline
CT calcium score of aortic valve
Change in aortic valve calcium score (Agatston units) from baseline to 2 years as determined by CT
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve function
Change in echocardiographic parameters of aortic valve function (both stenosis and regurgitation) from baseline to 1 year and 2 years as determined by Doppler echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years
Frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events
Frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, admission with heart failure, repeat valve surgery) as determined by annual clinical follow-up of study population over 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Immunohistochemical staining of explanted aortic bioprostheses for marker of calcification
Immunohistochemical staining for markers of mineralisation (alkaline phosphatase, Runx-2, osteocalcin) in explanted aortic valve bioprostheses expressed as a percentage of total valve surface area.
Time frame: intraoperative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.