Pain Sensitization and Outcome Following Physiotherapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview

Pain is the dominant symptom of knee osteoarthritis and recent evidence suggests factors outside of local joint pathology, such as pain sensitization, can contribute significantly to the pain experience. It is unknown how pain sensitization influences outcomes from commonly employed interventions such as physiotherapy. The aims of this study are, firstly to identify people with knee OA who display signs and symptoms associated with pain sensitization using clinical tools and quantitative sensory testing. Secondly, we will investigate if indications of pain sensitization at baseline are associated with poor outcome following physiotherapy. Methods and analysis: This is a multi-centre prospective cohort study with 140 participants. Eligible patients with moderate/severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis will be identified at hospital outpatient clinics. A baseline assessment will provide a comprehensive description of the somatosensory characteristics of each participant by means of clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing and validated questionnaires measuring pain and functional capacity. Participants will then undergo physiotherapy treatment, in line with current clinical guidelines. Follow-up post physiotherapy treatment (estimated to be at 3 months) will assess pain, disability (sub-scales of Western Ontario and McMasters University Score Osteoarthritis Index) and participants' global rating of change. These primary outcome measures will dichotomise participants into treatment 'responders' and 'non-responders' according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) treatment responder criteria. For data analysis results from pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation will create a composite score of pain sensitization. Logistic regression will explore the relationship between response to physiotherapy and pain sensitization at baseline while accounting for various cofounders.

BACKGROUND The pathophysiology of knee OA pain is complex. Altered processing of nociceptive inputs at spinal and higher brain centers may help explain discrepancies between pain severity and pathological abnormalities in OA. Central sensitization is described as an increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons at spinal and supraspinal levels to normal or sub-threshold afferent input leading to hyperalgesia. It may also include dysfunction of endogenous pain control systems. Furthermore, peripheral pro-inflammatory mediators and neuropeptides in knee OA can sensitize nociceptors, lowering their threshold for activation. This increased responsiveness of peripheral nociceptors is referred to as peripheral sensitization. Both peripheral and central nervous system sensitization, clinically referred to as pain sensitization can result can be an enhanced, persistent and more widespread pain response. Recent studies have found the presence of increased pain sensitivity at remote sites, enhanced temporal summation and hypersensitivity to various stimuli to be associated with reports of more severe knee pain symptoms. These studies are cross-sectional and although they link signs of sensitization with greater levels of pain and disability they cannot infer causality. There is some evidence to suggest increased pain sensitivity negatively affects treatment outcomes. In painful musculoskeletal conditions such as shoulder impingement and lateral epicondylalgia widespread pressure pain sensitivity and thermal hyperalgesia, have been linked with a poorer prognosis. Surgical outcomes for knee osteoarthritis may also be affected with the presence of increased pain sensitivity prior to total knee replacement associated with more persistent pain after surgery. Physiotherapy is a widely recommended conservative management approach. Studies of prognosis in knee OA have focused on demographic and psychological variable, few studies have focused on factors relating to abnormal pain processing. No longitudinal studies have explored prognostic factors relating to pain sensitization and outcome following physiotherapy. In whiplash associated disorders the presence of sensory hypersensitivity and cold hyperalgesia has been shown to reduce the likelihood of a positive response to physiotherapy treatment. Thus it is conceivable, but currently unproven, that knee OA patients with evidence of pain sensitization have poorer outcomes following physiotherapy. One obstacle to investigating the implications of pain sensitization is reliably identifying it in the clinical setting. Clinical criteria proposed for assessing central sensitization rely principally on the clinician's subjective interpretation of patient symptoms. Although useful clinically, for research purposes more objective measures are preferable. Due to the complexity of the pain experience it is inadvisable to rely on any single test to reflect peripheral and central pain mechanisms. A multi-tissue assessment using a multi-modal stimuli approach has been advocated, and will be adopted in this study. Recognised features of central and peripheral sensitization previously identified in knee OA patients will be incorporated into this study and these include extended areas of hyperalgesia, enhanced temporal summation, and dysfunctional conditioned pain modulation. This study will explore clinical outcomes of knee OA (pain, function, patient's global assessment) following physiotherapy, investigating the association between key features of pain sensitization and the likelihood of a poor outcome. Distinguishing patients at risk of a poor outcome can help determine appropriate management strategies in a timely manner. STUDY AIMS: The main aims of the study are; firstly to provide a comprehensive description of the somatosensory characteristics of people with pain associated with knee OA (by means of clinical examination, QST, and validated questionnaires measuring pain, functional capacity and quality of life) and secondly, to investigate if the presence of pain sensitization at baseline is associated with poorer response to physiotherapy treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design: A multi-centre observational cohort study with assessments at baseline, at 3 months (on completion of physiotherapy treatment) and at six months will be conducted. Following the baseline assessment for features of pain sensitization all participants will receive usual physiotherapy care. The relationship between pain sensitization and outcomes in terms of pain and disability will be explored through regression analysis. Setting: The study will be set in the physiotherapy outpatient departments of three large publicly funded teaching hospitals in Dublin, Ireland. Participants: Patients with symptomatic knee OA referred for physiotherapy treatment by a hospital consultant or clinical specialist physiotherapist will be eligible for inclusion. Healthy controls: Forty age and gender matched pain-free controls will be recruited. The controls will provide reference data for QST results. Recruitment procedure: A consecutive sample of knee osteoarthritis patients with moderate/severe knee pain will be recruited. Potentially eligible participants will be identified at musculoskeletal assessment clinics and from physiotherapy outpatient waiting lists. A feasible recruitment rate is estimated at 12 patients per month with recruitment continuing until the specified numbers are achieved. Those who agree to participate will attend for a baseline assessment prior to commencing physiotherapy treatment. Written informed consent will be obtained before enrolment in the study. Physiotherapy management: Physiotherapy treatment will be in line with current clinical guidelines for the management of knee OA. (McAlindon et al., 2014). A workshop led by the principal investigator will be held at each recruitment site prior to study commencement where physiotherapists will receive an update on clinical guidelines and current best evidence on management of knee OA. This will standardise treatment to some degree, but intervention will be individualised at the discretion of the treating physiotherapist. Assessment Baseline assessment: Each baseline assessment will take approximately 50 minutes to complete at the physiotherapy clinic by the principal investigator. Some questionnaires will be posted and completed in advance by participants. Follow up assessment: The primary endpoint will be on completion of physiotherapy treatment (this is expected to be at 3 months; estimated duration of a course of physiotherapy treatment). Six months after enrolment into the study participants will complete a postal questionnaire assessing pain and function. They will exit the study at this point. Testing procedure: In order to improve reliability of the assessment and minimise bias standardised assessment procedures will be followed. Studies support the reliability of QST measures where protocols are standardised and both the tester and participant are carefully instructed. Outcome Variables: Primary and secondary outcomes are outlined in section below. Identifying and Quantifying Pain Sensitization: Abnormal pain pressure thresholds and temporal summation have been previously used for identifying sub-groups of patients with widespread pain hypersensitivity. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is reflective of the endogenous inhibitory capacity of the nociceptive system and dysfunction of CPM is associated with syndromes such as fibromyalgia and temporomandibular joint disorder where central sensitization is a recognised hallmark. Pain sensitization will therefore be operationalized by the presence of decreased PPTs and enhanced temporal summation at local (knee) and remote (arm) sites in addition to dysfunctional CPM. The cut-off point for what is abnormal or sensitized will be determined when control data has been gathered and the spread or variability of 'normal' results is seen. Points will be summed to produce a pain sensitization score where a higher score will represent greater pain sensitization. DATA ANALYSIS PLAN Data will be analysed using SPSS v 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all outcome measures at baseline. Initial analyses will be exploratory to compare symptom profiles between people who respond to treatment and treatment non-responders. Treatment responders will be categorised by the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. Categorical variables will be analysed using chi-square tests. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) will be used to compare continuous normally distributed variables between responders and non-responders. The Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for comparison of variables that are not normally distributed. A p value of less than 0.05 will be considered significant. A logistic regression model will be developed to predict response to physiotherapy treatment with 'treatment responder' as the dependant variable. The model will be adjusted for predetermined variables based on the previous literature (age, gender, obesity, socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms, treatment adherence, comorbidities and presence of widespread pain). The pain sensitization score will be entered into the regression model as an independent variable. Sample size: The sample size was calculated based on the number of explanatory variables planned for inclusion in the logistic regression model. It is intended to include 8 explanatory variables and allow 15 participants for each explanatory variable. Recruiting 140 participants while allowing for a 20% loss to follow-up should ensure adequate numbers. Dropouts: All participants will be followed up on discharge from physiotherapy. Patients will be considered lost to follow-up if they do not complete the primary outcome measure post treatment. DISCUSSION To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the effects of pain sensitization on clinical outcomes in response to physiotherapy in patients with knee OA. There is a lack of a standardized protocol for assessing pain sensitization in the clinical setting. This study selects tests based on their utility in the clinical setting. The results may identify a small selection of outcome measures that are practical for assessing pain sensitization and associated with an increased risk of poor outcome. This clinically based observational study does not aim to investigate the effects of specific physiotherapy treatments. It will observe people undergoing usual physiotherapy and variation in the intervention is to be expected. Nonetheless an attempt to standardise care to some degree will be made by using current evidence based guidelines and keeping a record of the physiotherapy intervention and adherence for each participant. Recruiting the participant sample from the secondary care setting will limit the generalizability of study findings to patient populations in primary care. Given its relatively short follow-up period we cannot infer causality directly from our data with regard to pain sensitization and physiotherapy outcomes. Nonetheless it may point to a relationship worthy of further investigation in order to better understand pain mechanisms in knee OA and optimise physiotherapy outcomes in the future.