The goal of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of the phone follow-up method compared to the conventional filler taken one.
This study is a multicenter, non-drug therapy and randomized research trial, comparing a group of patients integrating the phone monitoring device (DST group) to a control group where patients are cared for in the usual way. Subject recruiting modalities: The study population represents patients diagnosis, PNES confirmed by following by the video-EEG, recorded in a center of epilepsy and in different CHU and informed of the diagnosis of PNES in a standardized manner. Patients were recruited during their hospitalization video-EEG is conducted in part of the diagnostic workup of drug-resistant epilepsies, or demonstrations paroxysmal undetermined which may prove to be PNES. Usual care: After diagnosis of PNES: orientation psychiatric care or CMP liberal and meeting biannual with the neurologist. In the study: * For patients in both groups: Management usual care and, in addition, quotation questionnaires of quality of life and evaluation by a neuropsychologist biannually for 24 months after the appointment with the neurologist. * For patients in the DST group only: Phone calls by psychologist at J 15, at 2 months, then every 2 months until M12. The device telephone follow (DST) consists of telephone calls (D15, M2, then every 2 months until M12) of the patient by an external independent psychologist designed to inform the patient about its pathology, promote acceptance of diagnosis, support the patient in his approach to care encouraging psychiatric observation. The device does not replace psychiatric counseling recommended.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
136
For patients in the DST group only: Phone calls by clinical psychologist at J 15 at 2, then every 2 months until M12.
Chu Strasbourg
Strasbourg, Alsace, France
RECRUITINGChu Dijon
Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
RECRUITINGChu Reims
Reims, Champagne Ardennes, France
RECRUITINGEvolution of quality of life scores every 6 months (From 6 to 24 months)
The primary endpoint is the assessment of quality of life scores measured at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after start of treatment (visit D0) by self-administered questionnaires of quality of life (SF-36 general questionnaire quality of life) and QOLIE 31 (specific questionnaire epilepsy).
Time frame: 24 months
Frequency of non epileptic seizures per month
Seizures diaries follow
Time frame: 24 months (average for 6 months)
Severity of seizures
Duration, injuries, loss of urine and feces, fall, loss of consciousness and subjective control feel of the listed crisis between 0 and 10 on EVA scale crisis control feel.
Time frame: 24 months
Psychiatric symptomology scores
Questionnaires (DSM-IV, Beck 21, MADRS, HAMA, DES, SDQ-20, TAS 20, Brief COPE)
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of programmed psychological consultation and actually honored in medical and psychological center
This percentage is collected in medical and psychological center or from liberal psychiatrist \\ psychologist (collected with phone call)
Time frame: 24 months
Number of urgent consultations or unprogrammed and \ or unprogrammed
consultations ( SAMU, emergency, reanimation, unprogrammed neurological consultations).
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Chu Nancy
Nancy, Lorraine, France
RECRUITING