This phase II trial studies how well nivolumab with or without ipilimumab works in treating patients with anal canal cancer that has not responded to previous treatment (refractory) and that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate overall response rate (ORR) with nivolumab in patients with previously treated metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal. (Part A) II. To determine an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when nivolumab is combined with ipilimumab versus (vs.) nivolumab alone in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA (Part B). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) of nivolumab in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal. (Part A) II. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal treated with nivolumab. (Part A) III. To evaluate the grade 3 and 4 toxicity rate in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal when treated with nivolumab. (Part A) IV. To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) of nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal. (Part B) V. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal treated with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab. (Part B) VI. To evaluate the grade 3 and 4 toxicity rate in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal when treated with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab. (Part B) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate ORR, PFS, and OS based on expression of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), peritumoral cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), peritumoral CD4+ TILs, and regulatory T cells as analyzed from tumor biopsies in previously treated patients with metastatic SCCA of the anal canal when treated with nivolumab. (Part A) II. To evaluate radiographic responses according to relative changes in proportions of anti-human papillomavirus (HPV) specific CD8+ and CD4+ TILs and regulatory T cells in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal following treatment with nivolumab, analyzed from serial peripheral blood samples. (Part A) III. To evaluate ORR, PFS, and OS based on expression of PD-L1, PD-1, peritumoral CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), peritumoral CD4+ TILs, and regulatory T cells as analyzed from tumor biopsies in previously treated patients with metastatic SCCA of the anal canal when treated with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab. (Part B) IV. To evaluate radiographic responses according to relative changes in proportions of anti-HPV specific CD8+ and CD4+ TILs and regulatory T cells in patients with previously treated metastatic SCCA of the anal canal following treatment with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab. (Part B) OUTLINE: PART A: Patients receive nivolumab intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes once every two weeks. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and blood sample collection throughout the study. PART B: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive nivolumab IV over 30 minutes once every 4 weeks. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan, MRI and blood sample collection throughout the study. ARM II: Patients receive nivolumab as in Arm I. Patients also receive ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes once every 8 weeks. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan, MRI and blood sample collection throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 100 days and then every 3 months for 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo CT scan
Given IV
Undergo MRI
Given IV
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, United States
UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Smilow Cancer Hospital-Derby Care Center
Derby, Connecticut, United States
Overall response rate: number of participants with response (Part A)
Responses assessed using computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging according to standard Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria in order to assess disease progression. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance all target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm (\< 1 cm). Partial Response (PR): \> 30% decrease in sum diameters of target lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): \> 20% increase in sum diameters lesions. (Note: appearance of one or \> new lesions considered progressions). Stable Disease (SD): Neither shrinkage qualify for PR nor increase for PD.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Progression-free survival (PFS) (Part B)
Time frame: Time period from the date of randomization to the date of PD or death whichever occurred first, assessed up to 2 years
Number of participants with toxicities (Part A)
Will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. The most frequent of adverse events measured relative to the total number of patients treated, and the toxicities tabulated by grade according to CTCAE.
Time frame: Up to 100 days post-treatment
Overall survival (Part A and B)
Time measured from initiation of treatment with nivolumab till death. Kaplan-Meier analysis will be performed to estimate the median overall survival with a 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: From initiation of treatment with nivolumab until death, assessed up to 2 years
Progression-free Survival (Part A)
From initiation of treatment with nivolumab until the time of disease progression, time measured in months. Kaplan-Meier analysis performed to estimate the median progression-free survival with a 90% confidence interval.
Time frame: From initiation of treatment with nivolumab until the time of disease progression, assessed up to 2 years
Overall response rates (Part B)
Responses assessed using CT scans or magnetic resonance imaging according to standard RECIST 1.1 criteria in order to assess disease progression. CR: Disappearance all target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm (\< 1 cm). PR: \> 30% decrease in sum diameters of target lesions. PD: \> 20% increase in sum diameters lesions. (Note: appearance of one or \> new lesions considered progressions). SD: Neither shrinkage qualify for PR nor increase for PD.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Incidence of grade 3/4/5 adverse events (Part B)
Will be assessed by CTCAE version 5.0.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center-Fairfield
Fairfield, Connecticut, United States
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center - Guilford
Guilford, Connecticut, United States
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center at Saint Francis
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Smilow Cancer Center/Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
...and 46 more locations