The investigators will test the hypothesis that that greater efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (antiTNF) therapy results in reduced need for bowel resection surgery, fewer serious infections, and reduced short term mortality risks, and therefore has a more favorable benefit to harm profile than corticosteroids for inflammatory bowel disease.
The investigators will conduct a comparative effectiveness study among Medicare Parts A, B, and D beneficiaries with inflammatory bowel disease. The investigators will compare the incidence of severe infection, bowel resection surgery, and death among new users of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies and corticosteroids. The investigators will compute propensity scores to describe the propensity for treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs compared to corticosteroids, and will match corticosteroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor drug treated patients on the propensity score. Cox regression will be employed to assess the hazard ratio for each of the outcomes.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
9,573
There is no intervention
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Mortality Rate
Incidence of death per 1000 person-years Outcome Measure Time Frame:Follow-up was from the date that the participant first met the criteria for either prolonged corticosteroid use or new anti-TNF use until either the patient died, discontinued enrollment in Medicaid or Medicare Part A, B, or D, reached age 90, was newly diagnosed with other immune-mediated diseases or AIDS, or reached the end of the available data, whichever came first, assessed up to 13 years. Follow-up of patients with UC also ended if they were diagnosed with a fistula, as this would usually change the diagnosis to CD.
Time frame: See Outcome Measure Description above
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.