Context: Chest compressions represent an important physical effort leading to fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality degradation. Despite a known harmful effect of chest compressions interruptions, current guidelines still recommend provider switch every 2 minutes. Feedback impact on chest compressions quality during an extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains to be assessed. Study design: simulated prospective monocentric randomized crossover trial. Participants and methods: Sixty professionals rescuers of the pre-hospital care unit of University Hospital of Caen (doctors, nurses and ambulance drivers) are enrolled to performed 10 minutes of continuous chest compression on manikin (ResusciAnne®, Laerdal), twice, with and without a feedback device (CPRmeter®). Correct compression score (the main criterion) is defined by reached target of rate, depth and leaning at the same time (recorded continuously). Hypothesis: Feedback device delay fatigue effect arises during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
University Hospital of Caen
Caen, France
Correct compression score
Correct compression score is defined by reached target of rate, depth and leaning at the same time
Time frame: 24h
Decrease time of 30% of correct compression score
Time frame: 24h
chest compression deep
Time frame: 24h
chest compression rate
Time frame: 24h
percentage of chest compression without leaning
Time frame: 24h
percentage of chest compression with correct deep
Time frame: 24h
percentage of correct chest compression rate
Time frame: 24h
participants' fatigue (Borg's scale)
Time frame: 24h
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.