The aim of this study is first to assess if desflurane is superior in order to achieve a faster emergence from anesthesia.
The aim of this study is first to assess if desflurane is superior in order to achieve a faster emergence from anesthesia (stating the date of birth) and second if desflurane is non-inferior in the occurrence of airway complications compared to sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in the setting of laryngeal mask airway.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
352
inhalation with laryngeal mask to maintain anaesthesia
inhalation with laryngeal mask to maintain anaesthesia
intravenous injection to maintain anaesthesia
RWTH Aachen University; Department of Anesthesia
Aachen, Germany
Martha-Maria Hospital Halle Dölau gGmbH, Department of Anesthesia
Halle, Germany
Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Department of Anesthesia
Reutlingen, Germany
University Hospital Ulm, Department of Anesthesia
Ulm, Germany
time of emergence from anesthesia
time of emergence from anesthesia defined as time between cessation of anesthesia until patient is able to state his/her date of birth on command
Time frame: up to 15 minutes
Airway reactions (Incidence of intraoperative coughs, laryngospasm)
Incidence of intraoperative coughs (induction/maintenance) - non-inferiority design Incidence of intraoperative laryngospasm (induction/maintenance) Incidence of cough at emergence Incidence of laryngospasms at emergence
Time frame: up to 2 hours
Emergence times
Time to remove laryngeal mask Time to open eyes on command Time to respond on command (press hand) Time to state the name on command Recovery Index (RI = 1 + Aldrete5min/\[(2xextubation time) + 1 x opening eyes time)\]
Time frame: up to 15 minutes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.