The primary objective is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of DWP-450 (Botulinum purified neurotoxin, Type A) Injection in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with corrugator and/or procerus muscle activity in adult subjects
Three hundred and twenty-four eligible subjects will be randomly assigned 3:1 to receive DWP-450 or placebo. Safety and efficacy will be assessed on Days 2, 7, 14, 30, 90, 120 and 150. The primary efficacy end point assesses the effectiveness of the DWP-450 against placebo on Day 30 in a superiority design.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
330
Botulinum toxin, Type A
Placebo
Steven Fagien, MD
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2 Point Improvement in Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) as Independently Assessed by Investigator and and Subject
The primary efficacy end point assesses the effectiveness of DWP-450 against placebo on Day 30. The primary efficacy measure is a composite end point. Using the GLS scale, investigators and subjects will assess the glabellar lines at Day 0 and Day 30. A subject is a responder only if both the investigator and subject independently agree that a ≥2 improvement has occurred from Day 0 to Day 30. GLS is scored: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Time frame: Day 30
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2 Point Improvement in Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) as Independently Assessed by Investigator and and Subject
Secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects classified as responders on Day 120. This was a composite endpoint based on both the Investigator and subject assessments of glabellar lines at maximum frown on the GLS; a subject was a responder only if both the Investigator and subject independently agreed that a ≥2 point improvement had occurred from Day 0 to 120 Day GLS is scored: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Time frame: Day 120
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2 Point Improvement in Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) as Independently Assessed by Investigator and and Subject
Secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects classified as responders on Day 150. This was a composite endpoint based on both the Investigator and subject assessments of glabellar lines at maximum frown on the GLS; a subject was a responder only if both the Investigator and subject independently agreed that a ≥2 point improvement had occurred from Day 0 to 150 Day GLS is scored: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Time frame: Day 150
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2 Point Improvement in Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) as Independently Assessed by Investigator and and Subject
Secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects classified as responders on Day 90. This was a composite endpoint based on both the Investigator and subject assessments of glabellar lines at maximum frown on the GLS; a subject was a responder only if both the Investigator and subject independently agreed that a ≥2 point improvement had occurred from Day 0 to 90 Day GLS is scored: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 90