This study seeks to compare the use of ultrasound and electrophysiologic techniques to target muscles for the treatment of spasticity and focal dystonia of the limbs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of two ways of locating the muscle for botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity. Electrophysiologic guidance, using electrical stimulation, and ultrasound are the standard ways of locating muscles during a treatment of BoNT injection.
This is a study to investigate the use of two targeting techniques for botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity: Electrophysiologic guidance, using electrical stimulation, and ultrasound. Subjects will be selected from the clinical programs of both Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the National Institutes of Health who are already receiving onabotulinum toxin A injections clinically. The study will consist of four visits. Visit one consists of screening subjects who will then be consented and randomized to one of the two treatment techniques for their ona-BoNT injection: 1) Electrophysiologic guidance using electrical stimulation or 2) ultrasound. Visit 2 will occur at week 4 where the subjects will return for a follow up visit to have blinded evaluator measurements of efficacy and strength and capture safety data. Visit 3 will be at week 12 when subjects will cross over and have the alternate treatment technique during their ona-BoNT injection. Visit 4 will occur at week 16 as the final assessment where subjects will have measurements of efficacy and strength and capture safety data by the blinded evaluator.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of two ways of locating the muscle for botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity located by either electrical stimulation using a needle or ultrasound using sound waves.
The purpose of this study is to compare how the muscle is located by either electrical stimulation using a needle or ultrasound using sound waves.
Ninds, Nih
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change
clinical or patient self-rating form for grading evaluation of the treatment at 16 weeks as compared to at 4 weeks. Full scale from 0 = no improvement and 100 normal use. Higher score indicates better health outcome.
Time frame: 4 weeks and 16 weeks
Change in Visual Analog Scale
patient perception of satisfaction and comfort at 16 weeks as compared to at 4 weeks. Full scale from 0 = no improvement to 100 = normal. Higher score indicates more improvement.
Time frame: 4 weeks and 16 weeks
Change in Muscle Strength
Muscle strength measured by dynamometry at 16 weeks as compared to at 4 weeks. Full scale 0 = no weakness and 100 is unable to move. Higher score indicates poorer health outcome.
Time frame: 4 weeks and 16 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.