Crick
HomeTrialsGenesDrugs23andMeGraphBlogContact
  • Home
  • Trials
  • Genes
  • Drugs
  • 23andMe
  • Graph
  • Blog
  • Contact
Crick

An open-source clinical intelligence platform. Explore clinical trials, gene networks, and molecular structures using public data sources.

Data Sources

  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • OpenTargets
  • ClinVar
  • PubChem

Links

  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy

© 2026 Crick. All rights reserved.

Crick is for educational purposes only. Not medical advice.

Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Applied in Orthodontic. Orthodontic Patients.

Phase 1CompletedNCT02337192
University of Sao Paulo24 enrolled

Overview

We demonstrated the use of the Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as a coadjutant oral decontamination agent. It was also shown that SDS surfactant improves the antibacterial action of APDT when using Curcumin as the photosensitizer. The decontamination levels obtained with APDT are comparable with the levels observed with the use of Chlorhexidine. The clinical relevancy is the control of oral microbial load which will improve the patients' quality of life and will decrease the possibility of cross contamination in the dental office.

The installation of the orthodontic appliances promotes an increase in the retentive area available for microbial aggregation, difficult the oral health promotion and, in addition, promotes the artificial selection of biofilms containing a higher load of pathogenic microorganisms. In this way, it becomes of critical importance, the development of techniques that might aid in the reduction of the oral microbial load. One possible approach is the use of the Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (APDT). In this direction, the objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of the APDT and the association of the APDT with the SDS surfactant as oral decontamination agents in orthodontic patients. The selected patients (n=24) were randomly distributed within seven experimental groups: G1 - Negative control, G2 - Curcumin mouthwash, G3 - Curcumin mouthwash+SDS, G4 - light irradiation, G5 - APDT, G6 - APDT+SDS and G7 - Positive Control (Chlorhexidine mouthwash). Nonstimulated saliva samples were collected from each one of the patients in three steps (S), as follows: S1- Initial condition, S2 - Treatment with mouthwashes (water, Chlorhexidine or Curcumin) and S3 - After APDT treatment. The efficacy of the proposed treatment protocols was assessed in function of the survival fraction observed in each group. The obtained results were statistically analyzed using variance analysis (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

24

Conditions

Dentist-Patient Relations

Interventions

CurcuminDRUG
LEDDEVICE
SurfactantDRUG
DMSO + waterDRUG
Chlorhexidine gluconateDRUG

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 50 YearsHealthy volunteers:
Medical Language ↔ Plain English
Inclusion Criteria: * Inclusion criteria were: being under fixed orthodontic treatment, absence of clinical signs of periodontal disease, not used antibiotics 90 days prior to the participation on this study and not use fluoride mouthwashes. Exclusion Criteria: * Exclusion criteria were: signs of uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes, high blood pressure and heart conditions), breast feeding or pregnant women, patients with oral tumors and patients with history of allergy to any of the materials used, such as Curcumin and Chlorhexidine.

Locations (1)

Vitor Hugo Panhóca

São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Microbiological analysis by the total number of colony-forming units (CFU)

Time frame: one section ( one hour)

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.