The study will determine whether clinicians who use a diagnostic device treat suspicious occlusal carious lesions (SOCL) surgically more often, with the same frequency, or less frequently, than dentists not relying on a diagnostic device. The study will also determine -- among those SOCLs that are opened -- whether the proportion of lesions that extend into the dentin when dentists are using a diagnostic device is more than, the same, or less than when no device is used.
The overall objectives of this study is to assess the contributions of diagnostic devices in clinicians' decision-making processes surrounding suspicious occlusal carious lesions (SOCL), an assessment that has not yet been attempted, despite the growing popularity of these devices. SOCLs can be defined as occlusal surface areas where visual, tactile, and radiographic signs are insufficient to definitively diagnose caries but where some of these signs are present.This study examines the use of two diagnostic devices on dental practitioners' identification and treatment of SOCLs. During a four-week pre-intervention period, 90 clinicians will collect and record descriptive and treatment information for the SOCLs they identify. Clinicians will then be randomized into one of 3 study arms: no diagnostic device, DIAGNOdent®, and Spectra®, and will collect and record similar information as the pre-intervention period for another six weeks, enrolling an additional 20 SOCLs. They will also complete diagnostic vignettes at the beginning and end of the study, as well as a post-study questionnaire on the utility of the devices, if assigned to a device arm. Analyses will examine differences in proportion of SOCLs treated surgically in the groups with and without the diagnostic device; and, for those treated surgically, differences in the proportions of SOCLs with extension into dentin. Differences in pre- and post-study responses on the vignettes will suggest which components of the decision-making process involved in SOCL identification and management have been modified by use of the diagnostic devices.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3,085
Spectra Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment.
DIAGNOdent Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Number of Lesions That Received Invasive Treatment and the Number of Lesions Receiving Invasive Treatment That Extended Into Dentin
There was one lesion/patient.
Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (one day visit)
Number of Clinicians in Likelihood of Surgically Treating Lesions in Online Vignettes That Display Two Levels of Five Cues (Color, Surface Smoothness, Surface Luster, Caries Risk, and Device Reading (if Applicable) in Post-intervention
Clinicians' likelihood of treating surgical lesions depicted with brown verses black, smooth verses rough, shiny verses matte, in patients with high verses low caries risk, by post-intervention phases. The outcome measure will be to see what cues were used or treatment decisions in the post-intervention phase. Please note that more than one cue could be chosen, so values may add up to more than 100 percent. Participants in the no device group did not receive a device reading cue.
Time frame: Post-intervention (dentists completed the vignettes one time)
Number of Clinicians in Likelihood of Surgically Treating Lesions in Online Vignettes That Display Two Levels of Four Cues (Color, Surface Smoothness, Surface Luster, and Caries Risk) in Pre-intervention
Clinicians' likelihood of treating surgical lesions depicted with brown verses black, smooth verses rough, shiny verses matte, in patients with high verses low caries risk, by post-intervention phases. The outcome measure will be to see what cues were used or treatment decisions in the pre-intervention phase. Please note that more than one cue could be chosen, so values may add to more than 100 percent of participants.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (dentists completed the vignettes one time)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States