The purpose of this study is to compare the operative, anatomic functional outcome as well as the subjective outcome of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacropexy compared to laparoscopic hysteropexy (conserving the uterus). The investigators expect that both laparoscopic procedures are equal in regards to operation time, complication rate, anatomic and functional outcome as well as subjective outcome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Laparoscopic hysteropexy
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, Aargau (AG), Switzerland
RECRUITINGOperation time
Comparison of operation time in the 2 arms of the study
Time frame: expected average of 150 minutes
Intra- and postoperative complication rate
Time frame: 1 year
Duration of anaesthesia
Time frame: expected average of 200 minutes
IUGA Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q)
Time frame: 8 weeks before surgical intervention and at follow up 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Bladder and bowel function, Prolapse symptoms, Sexuality
Assessed via Pelvic Function Questionnaire
Time frame: 8 weeks before surgical intervention and at follow up 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Quality of Life
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time frame: 8 weeks before surgical intervention and at follow up 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Patient satisfaction after surgery
Time frame: At follow up 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.