The study intervention consists of the early integration of palliative care services into standard oncology care in an outpatient setting for patients with advanced lung and non-colorectal gastrointestinal malignancies who are not being treated with curative intent. The palliative care services provided to patients randomized to the intervention will be provided by board-certified physicians and/or advanced practice nurses and will focus on the following areas: (1) developing and maintaining the therapeutic relationship with the patients and family caregivers; (2) assessing and treating patient symptoms; (3) providing support and reinforcement of coping with advanced cancer in patients and family caregivers; (4) assessing and enhancing prognostic awareness and illness understanding in patients and family caregivers; (5) assisting with treatment decision-making; and (6) end-of-life care planning.
There will be about 400 patients enrolled in this intervention study and there will be about 300 family caregivers enrolled as well. This study will consist of two study groups as previously described. The effects of the early involvement of the palliative care team will be compared to the usual approach of receiving care mostly from the cancer treatment team. The stratification factors include tumor type (lung vs. esophageal/gastric vs. hepatic/biliary/pancreatic) and family care giver participation (yes vs. no). Patients will be on this study for as long as they receive care. Institutions must have an outpatient palliative care clinic that meets the study site requirements as defined in the protocol. The outpatient clinic leadership must include a physician and/or advanced practice nurses board certified in palliative care. The primary and secondary endpoints are described below. Primary Endpoint: To determine the efficacy of early integrated palliative care on patient reported quality of life at 12 weeks using the FACT in patients with newly diagnosed incurable lung or non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer Secondary Endpoints: * To determine the efficacy of early integrated palliative care on other patient reported outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed incurable lung or non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer, by assessing the endpoints defined in the protocol * To determine the efficacy of early integrated palliative care on family caregiver reported outcomes in those newly diagnosed incurable lung or non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer, by assessing the endpoints defined in the protocol * To assess the impact of early integrated palliative care on the quality of end-of-life care and resource utilization in patients with newly diagnosed incurable lung or non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer by assessing the endpoints defined in the protocol * To determine concordance between patient and family caregiver report of prognosis/ curability
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
405
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Queen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem-Evanston Hospital
Evanston, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem-Glenbrook Hospital
Glenview, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem-Highland Park Hospital
Highland Park, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mercy Health Saint Mary's
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
...and 13 more locations
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to Week 12 Per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) on a 0-108 scale, with lower scores corresponding to worse overall QOL and higher scores corresponding to better overall QOL. Change from baseline to week-12 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week-12. Higher scores on FACT-G indicate better QOL.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to Week 24 Per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) on a 0-108 scale, with lower scores corresponding to worse overall QOL and higher scores corresponding to better overall QOL. Change from baseline to week-24 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week-24. Higher scores on FACT-G indicate better QOL.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to Week 12 Per the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression
Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression on a 0-21 scale, with lower scores corresponding to lower depression and higher scores corresponding to higher depression. Change from baseline to week-12 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week-12. Lower scores on the HADS-Depression indicate less depression symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to Week 12 Per the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety
Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety on a 0-21 scale, with lower scores corresponding to lower anxiety and higher scores corresponding to higher anxiety. Change from baseline to week-12 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week-12. Lower scores on the HADS-Anxiety indicate less anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Prognostic Understanding at Week-12 as Measured by "Have You and Your Oncologist Discussed Any Particular Wishes About the Care You Would Want to Receive if You Were Dying?" Question on the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire
Prognostic Understanding at Week-12 as measured by Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire: "Have you and your oncologist discussed any particular wishes about the care you would want to receive if you were dying?" responses at Week-12 are reported below.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Change in QOL on the SF-36 Over Time
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Rate of Referral, Enrollment and Length of Stay on Hospice
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Location of Death
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Number of Hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admissions and Days
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Chemotherapy and Radiation Administration
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall Survival
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Concordance Between Patient and Family Caregiver Report of Prognosis/Curability
Time frame: Up to 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.