This is a study comparing grazoprevir (MK-5172) plus elbasvir (MK-8742) treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) plus Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin (RBV) \[PR\] treatment in treatment-naïve and prior PR treatment failure participants with chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype (GT)1, GT4, or GT6 infection. The primary objectives are to compare efficacy (assessed by the percentage of participants achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks after ending study treatment \[SVR12\]) and safety between the grazoprevir plus elbasvir treatment arm and the SOF plus PR treatment arm. The primary hypothesis is that the percentage of participants achieving SVR12 in the grazoprevir plus elbasvir treatment arm is non-inferior to that in the SOF plus PR treatment arm.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
257
400 mg tablets, taken orally (PO) every day (QD) for 12 weeks.
PegIntron administered subcutaneously every week (QW) at 1.5 mcg/kg for 12 weeks.
Capsule and/or tablet administered PO twice daily (BID) based on weight (1000 - 1200 mg) for 12 weeks.
Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (100 mg/50 mg) FDC, taken PO QD for 12 weeks.
Primary: Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After the End of All Treatment (SVR12)
Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 on blood samples drawn from each participant. SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (\<LLOQ) at 12 weeks after the end of all study therapy. The primary efficacy hypothesis for this study was that the percentage of participants achieving SVR12 in the grazoprevir plus elbasvir arm was non-inferior to the percentage in the SOF plus PR arm. A secondary statistical analysis was performed to determine whether the percentage of participants achieving SVR12 in the grazoprevir plus elbasvir arm was superior to the percentage in the SOF plus PR arm.
Time frame: 12 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 24)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Period Plus First 14 Follow-up Days
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported for each treatment arm.
Time frame: Treatment + First 14 days of follow-up (Up to Week 14)
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was reported for each treatment arm. Participants that discontinued study drug treatment due to an AE may have still continued on trial.
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Tier 1 Safety Event (Key Safety Parameter) During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days
Tier 1 safety events were pre-specified by the protocol to evaluate safety and test the safety superiority hypothesis. Tier 1 safety events were chosen to assess broad tolerability, hematological side effects and liver-related laboratory abnormalities. For this study, Tier 1 safety events included: any serious drug-related AE, any drug-related AE leading to permanent discontinuation (DC) of all study drugs, neutrophil count \<0.75 x 10\^9/L, hemoglobin \<10 g/dL, severe depression, hepatic events of clinical interest (defined by abnormal increases in alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], or alkaline phosphatase \[ALP\]), or events meeting stopping rule criteria for DC from trial (due to abnormal increases of ALT, AST, or ALP with/without pre-specified related AEs). The percentage of participants who experienced each individual event that was defined as a Tier 1 safety event during the study treatment period was reported for each treatment arm.
Time frame: Treatment + First 14 days of follow-up (Up to Week 14)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Ending Study Treatment (SVR24)
HCV-RNA levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 on blood samples drawn from each participant. SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA \<LLOQ at 24 weeks after the end of all study therapy.
Time frame: 24 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 36)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 4 Weeks After Ending Study Treatment (SVR4)
HCV-RNA levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 on blood samples drawn from each participant. SVR4 was defined as HCV RNA \<LLOQ at 4 weeks after the end of all study therapy.
Time frame: 4 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 16)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.