INTRODUCTION: Dentoalveolar surgeries such as piezocision, have been developed with the aim to accelerate the tooth movement and therefore reduce the length of orthodontic treatment. Although this surgical technique seems to present several advantages, such as decreased risk of decalcification or orthodontic relapse, its use as a routine practice is not yet recommended. The main purpose of this study is to determine the duration of orthodontic treatment by using the piezocision. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effect of this surgical technique on bone density, root resorption, osteoclast activity, inflammatory events and pain assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The investigators will conduct a prospective study. The experimental group will consist of 14 adults, subjects from 18 to 40 years-old (10 women, 4 men). The control group will consist of 30 matched patients, who have been already treated in the orthodontic clinic of the University of Montreal. The reliabilities of Intra and Inter assesors will be measured for each doctor. After completion of the surgical guides from CBCT, the Piezocision will be performed the same day of the bracket indirect placement. The surgical procedure will be standardized and did it by the same surgeon. The appointments will be every 2 weeks for 4 months, then every month. The investigators will make an assessment of pain by using a numerical visual scale, during the first 7 days after surgery. Analysis of inflammatory markers (IL-1) and osteoclast activity (RANKL, OPG) will be evaluated from the gingival sulcus fluid collected at day 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weeks. At the end of the treatment, the overall quality evaluation of treatment using the "American Board of Orthodontics' grading system" would be realized by two blind external observers to limit bias.
EXPECTED RESULTS Orthodontic treatment accelerated by piézocicison will be completed within one year and will be 50% faster than a traditional treatment. The ratio benefit / risk of performing the piezocision will be acceptable for the patient and the orthodontist. We expect the following results: low pain, and absence of dental and periodontal deleterious effect (no root resorption, no tooth vitality loss and no bone loss). The same cohort can be used in future studies to assess the long term stability of the treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
14
Flapless corticotomies
University of Montreal, orthodontic department
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Determine the duration of orthodontic treatment associated with Piezocision
Assessment of the length of orthodontic treatment following piezocision
Time frame: 18 months
Compare the duration of treatment with the control group
Compare the duration of treatment to the control group already processed and matched by sex, age, type of malocclusion, orthodontic biomechanics to limit bias.
Time frame: 18 months
Assess the overall quality of treatment (American Board of Orthodontics' grading system)
At the end of the treatment, the overall quality evaluation of treatment using the "American Board of Orthodontics' grading system" would be realized by two blind external observers to limit bias.
Time frame: 18 months
Assessment of pain during treatment (numerical visual scale)
Assessment of pain by Visual Digital Scale during treatment
Time frame: Every days after the surgery durin 7 days and one day after every appointment
Evaluation of osteoclastic activity (analysis of RANKL and OPG markers by sampling in the gingival fluid with sterile paper points)
Osteoclastic activity measurement by analysis of RANKL and OPG markers by sampling in the gingival fluid with sterile paper points
Time frame: weeks 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24
Evaluation of inflammatory markers (quantification of interleukin-1 (IL-1))
Measurement of inflammatory markers in the gingival fluid with the quantification of interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time frame: weeks 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24
Evaluate changes in density and bone volume with the cone beam computed tomography or Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT)
Evaluate changes in density and bone volume with the cone beam computed tomography or Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT)
Time frame: 18 months
Evaluate root resorption with the Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT)
Evaluation of root resorption using CBCT
Time frame: 18 months
Evaluate the inflammatory and remodelling gene expression
Evaluation of the gene expression associated with inflammation following piezocision
Time frame: 0 and 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.