PERCEPIC: PERC Rule Combined With Implicit Low Clinical Probability

University Hospital, Angers1,773 enrolled

Overview

PERC rule was created to rule out pulmonary embolism (PE) without further exams, with residual PE risk \<2%. Its safety is currently confirmed in low PE prevalence populations as north-American. In European high PE prevalence population, it has been showed that PERC rule used alone or associated with low clinical probability assessed by revised Geneva score (RGS) was not safe. In retrospective study, we suggest that the combination of PERC rule with implicit clinical probability (gestalt) could allow the use of the PERC rule. PERCEPIC, an observational prospective multicenter study performed in France and Belgium, will test this hypothesis. Therefore, 3000 patients will be included in 12 centers. Primary outcome will be the rate of thromboembolic events or death related or possibly related to PE in patients with low implicit clinical probability and negative PERC rule (8 criteria absents). Upper limit of confidence interval of this rate must be equal or lower than 3% to consider PERC rule as safe in this combination.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

1,773

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism Dyspnea Thoracic Pain

Interventions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: \- Patients admitted to the emergency department for one of the following criteria : * Dyspnea and/or Thoracic pain without another obvious cause * Pulmonary embolism suspicion whatever the reason Exclusion Criteria: * Age lower than 18 * Patients hospitalized for more than 48h * Ongoing curative anticoagulant therapy for more than 48h before admission * Patients with thromboembolic disease diagnosed before the admission * Unavailability for follow-up (short life expectancy, no phone number…) * Patient refusing to be contacted by phone at 3 month * Patient refusing that medical data were collected * Secondary exclusion criteria : curative anticoagulant therapy for more than 5 days during the 3 month follow-up for another reason than thromboembolic disease.

Locations (12)

Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc

Brussels, Belgium

UH Erasme

Brussels, Belgium

UH Liège

Liège, Belgium

Hospital of Agen

Agen, France

UH Angers

Angers, France

Hospital of Argenteuil

Argenteuil, France

UH Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Hospital of Le Mans

Le Mans, France

UH Nantes

Nantes, France

UH Poitiers

Poitiers, France

...and 2 more locations

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To assess the accuracy of the combination of low implicit clinical probability (gestalt) and negative PERC rule (8 criteria absents)

Rate of thromboembolic events or death related or possibly related to PE in patients with low implicit clinical probability and negative PERC rule. Upper limit of confidence interval of this rate must be equal or lower than 3% to consider PERC rule as safe in this combination

Time frame: 3 months

Secondary Outcomes

To assess usefulness of PERC and implicit low clinical probability combination to reduce the use of further exams

Mean number of further exams performed per diagnostic strategy

Time frame: During emergency managment

To assess the accuracy of PERC and low clinical probability combination depending of clinical probability assessment method (implicit assessment, revised Geneva Score, Wells Score and implicit overridden Geneva Score)

For each methods, AUC in receiver operating characteristic analyses of the 3-level classification scheme will be compared.

Time frame: 3 months

To compare performances of clinical probability assessment methods : implicit assessment, revised Geneva Score, Wells Score and implicit overridden Geneva Score

For each methods, AUC in receiver operating characteristic analyses of the 3-level classification scheme will be compared

Time frame: 3 months