Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a geographically endemic, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated carcinoma of epidermoid origin. It occurs most commonly in Southern China and Southeast Asia. The NPC cells are poorly differentiated or undifferentiated with a high incidence of lymphatic and hematological dissemination. Because of the inherent anatomic constraints and a high degree of radiosensitivity, radiotherapy (RT) has been the primary treatment for NPC patients. NPC is also a chemosensitive tumor. Various modes of combined chemoradiotherapy have been used to treat NPC patients with advanced-stage diseases during recent 20 years. However, treatment outcome for locoregionally advanced NPC is still unsatisfactory.
The current NCCN guidelines recommend that CCRT + adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced (stage III-IV) NPC, originated from the results of the Intergroup study \[69\]. However, all meta-analysis reported no any benefit in using adjuvant chemotherapy for NPC patients \[82-85\]. These contradictions puzzle most oncologists for decades. In our opinion, routine delivery of post-radiation adjuvant chemotherapy after RT±induction/concurrent chemotherapy for "all" advanced-stage NPC patients should be re-considered. The major goal of adjuvant chemotherapy in NPC is to reduce the occurrences of distant failure. But, not all advanced NPC patients need adjuvant chemotherapy. In our previous phase III study, only 19.1% (27/141) NPC patients with 1988 AJCC stage III-IV disease developed distant failure after CCRT . In another study of 210 NPC patients with 1997 AJCC stage IIB-IVB treated by induction chemotherapy + RT, 55 patients (26.2%) suffered from subsequent distant metastasis \[67\]. We should remember that unnecessary adjuvant therapy is frequently used. For example, if the target patients have as high as 50% subsequent distant failure rate, and the adjuvant therapy protocol has a 50% control rate for the subclinical disease. When we treat all target patients, only 25% patients benefit from the adjuvant therapy because of unnecessary treatment in 50% and ineffective treatment in another 25% patients. Thus, adjuvant therapy should be designed for "selected" patients. For NPC patients, pEBV DNA-guided adjuvant therapy trial is very reasonable. We plan to prove that adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial for post-radiation detectable pEBV DNA patients in this prospective multi-center trial. We will conduct another trial to investigate (compare) which adjuvant chemotherapy regimen is the best one in the future.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Tainan, Taiwan
Mackay Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Sun Yat-sen University
Taipei, Taiwan
Time to progression
Time frame: 5 years
Progression-free survival and relapse rate
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Toxicity profile and tolerance, according to CTCAE 4.1
Time frame: 5 years
Predicting value of plasma EBV DNA
Time frame: 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.