This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well standard of care therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery and/or surgery works and compares it to standard of care therapy alone in treating patients with breast cancer that has spread to one or two locations in the body (limited metastatic) that are previously untreated. Standard of care therapy comprising chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological therapy, and others may help stop the spread of tumor cells. Radiation therapy and/or surgery is usually only given with standard of care therapy to relieve pain; however, in patients with limited metastatic breast cancer, stereotactic radiosurgery, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy, may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue and surgery may be able to effectively remove the metastatic tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard of care therapy is more effective with stereotactic radiosurgery and/or surgery in treating limited metastatic breast cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Phase II: To determine whether ablation \[through stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (stereotactic radiosurgery) and/or surgical resection of all known metastases\] in oligometastatic breast cancer patients provides a sufficient signal for improved progression-free survival (PFS) to warrant full accrual to the Phase III portion of the trial. II. Phase III: To determine whether ablation (through SBRT and/or surgical resection of all known metastases) in oligometastatic breast cancer patients significantly improves overall survival (OS). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate treated metastasis control according to tumor receptor status \[estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)\], use of chemotherapy, surgery versus (vs.) ablative therapy, and number of metastases. II. To evaluate whether the addition of ablative metastasis directed therapy significantly reduces the number of distant recurrences (new metastases) in patients who progress according to tumor receptor status (ER, PR, HER-2); use of chemotherapy, and number of metastases. III. To evaluate adverse events in patients who receive ablative metastasis-directed therapy to all known metastases in addition to standard medical therapy compared with those treated with standard medical therapy alone. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. To explore the most appropriate and clinically relevant technological parameters to ensure quality and effectiveness throughout the radiation therapy processes, including imaging, simulation, target and critical structure definition, treatment planning, image guidance, and delivery. TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether \< 5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) (per 7.5 ml of blood) is an independent prognostic (outcome) marker for improved PFS and OS in oligometastatic breast cancer. II. To determine whether \< 5 CTCs (per 7.5 ml of blood) is an independent predictive (response to therapy) marker for improved PFS and OS in oligometastatic breast cancer. III. To determine whether eliminating CTCs (0/7.5 ml of blood in patients with at least 2 CTCs at registration) is both a prognostic and predictive marker for improved PFS and OS. IV. To evaluate the prognostic and predictive properties of CTC count as a continuous measure of PFS and OS. V. To store material for retrospective analysis of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA). VI. To store material for retrospective analysis of circulating micro-ribonucleic acid (RNA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
129
Patients receive 1, 3, or 5 fractions of radiation, beginning within 6 weeks of study entry. * For metastases in the peripheral lung, patients receive a single fraction of 30 Gy or 3 fractions for a total of 45 Gy. * For a single liver metastases, patients receive a single fraction of 30 Gy. * For metastases in the abdominal-pelvic or liver (\>1), patients receive 3 fractions for a total of 45 Gy. * For metastases in the central lung or mediastinal/ cervical lymph nodes, patients receive 5 fractions for a total of 50 Gy. * For spinal metastases, patients receive 1 fraction of 20 Gy. * For non-spinal osseous metastases, patients receive 3 fractions for a total of 30 Gy. * For thoracic/cervical spine metastases, patients receive 5 fractions for a total of 35 Gy.
All surgical resections will be approached with intent of an R0 resection (rendering the patient with no evidence of measureable disease and pathologic negative margin) and must occur within 6 weeks of study entry. Approach to surgery will be based upon the treating surgeon. An open, laparoscopic, or thorascopic approach is acceptable.
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
CTCA at Western Regional Medical Center
Goodyear, Arizona, United States
Arizona Center for Cancer Care-Peoria
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Banner University Medical Center - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus
Berkeley, California, United States
Progression-free Survival (Phase II)
Progression (failure) is defined as any of the following: progression of metastases, new metastases, or death. Progression-free survival (PFS) time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or last contact when participant had a documented clinical assessment (censored). PFS rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Median PFS is provided.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: 3 mos after randomization and every 3 months to 24 months, then every six months to five years, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 63 months.
Overall Survival (Phase III)
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored).
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: 3 mos after randomization and every 3 months to 24 months and then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 63 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treated Metastasis Progression on the SOC + Ablation Arm
Metastasis progression (failure) is defined as the clearance and subsequent recurrence or the development of new metastases in the treated area. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last contact when participant had a documented clinical assessment (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Two-year failure rates are provided here.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: 3 months after randomization, every 3 months up to 24 months, every six months up to five years, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 63 months. Two-year rates are provide here.
Percentage of Participants With New Metastases
New metastases (failure) is defined as the appearance of any new metastases. Failure time is measured from randomization to the date of first failure, last contact when participant had a documented clinical assessment (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year failure rates are provided here
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: 3 months after randomization, every 3 months up to 24 months, every six months up to five years, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 63 months.Two-year rates are provided here.
Number of Patients by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: Arm 1: 3 mos. after randomization / Arm 2: weekly during SBRT and the last day of SBRT; both arms: then every 3 mos. to 24 mos., then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 63 months.
Progression-free Survival in the Presence or Absence of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs)
The presence of CTCs is defined as ≥ 5 CTCs (per 7.5ml of blood). Progression (failure) is defined as any of the following: progression of metastases, new metastases, or death. Progression-free survival (PFS) time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or last contact when participant had a documented clinical assessment (censored). PFS rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the groups, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year PFS rates are provided here
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: 3 months after randomization, every 3 months up to 24 months, every six months up to five years, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 63 months.Two-year rates are provided here.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
UC Irvine Health/Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, United States
...and 155 more locations