A pre-operative physical conditioning and weight loss intervention (prehabilitation) compared to standard counseling prior to ventral hernia repair for obese patients (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) at a safety-net hospital results in a higher proportion of patients being hernia- and complication-free 2 years after surgical consultation.
Background: Obesity is a risk factor for ventral hernia complications with or without repair, but the management strategy that best balances overall risks and benefits for obese patients with ventral hernias is unknown. The primary aim of this project is to compare the effect of prehabilitation (preoperative physical conditioning and weight loss intervention) versus standard preoperative counseling followed by repair for obese patients (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) with ventral hernias on outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive cohort study of obese patients who have ventral hernias will be performed. Within the comprehensive cohort study, patients who are candidates for elective ventral hernia repair will be randomized to a prehabilitation intervention or standard counseling with surgical repair once weight loss goals have been met. All patients will have repair after 6 months even if they have not met their weight loss goals. Patients who are not eligible for the trial or who refuse to participate will be followed in a non-randomized cohort; they will have their hernia repaired based upon current institution standards. (figure 1) The primary outcome of the study will be proportion of patients who are hernia- and complication- free 2 years after surgical consultation. This composite outcome was chosen in order to encompass all clinically important risks and benefits of both operative and non-operative strategies. Based on power calculations(alpha=0.05, beta=0.20), 232 eligible patients are needed assuming a 30% non-enrollment and 50% dropout. Since this is an efficacy trial, analysis will be performed per protocol as well as intention to treat. The primary outcome will be compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) will be used to identify independent predictors of a successful outcome defined as hernia- and complication free at 2 years. In addition to a frequentist analysis, a Bayesian analysis will be performed. Posterior point estimates, credible intervals, and probability of increase in proportion of patients without hernias or complications will be calculated. Conclusion: Prehabilitation may have no impact on outcomes following ventral hernia repair, cause more complications with acute hernia presentation, or prove superior and decrease recurrences and complications compared to standard of care. This randomized controlled trial will provide baseline information on the efficacy of prehabiliation prior to open ventral hernia repair in obese patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
284
information included in arm description
information included in arm description
Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Proportion of patients who are hernia- and complication-free
Time frame: 2 years after enrollment
Weight loss (number of participants with weight loss of at least 7%)
number of participants with weight loss of at least 7%
Time frame: 6 months after enrollment
Receipt of elective or emergency surgery
When the patient underwent elective or emergent surgery
Time frame: 6 months after enrollment
surgery-related complications (number of patients who developed infections or other complications related to the surgery)
number of patients who developed infections or other complications related to the surgery
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
hernia-related complications (number of patients who developed complications from their hernia)
number of patients who developed complications from their hernia
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Functional Status (Quality of life questionnaire responses)
Quality of life questionnaire responses
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
implementation outcomes (difference in costs between the patients in the treatment group and those in the usual care group)
difference in costs between the patients in the treatment group and those in the usual care group
Time frame: 2 years
Physiologic changes (number of pounds lost/gained)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
number of pounds lost/gained
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Metabolic changes (difference in basal metabolic rate before treatment and after treatment)
difference in basal metabolic rate before treatment and after treatment
Time frame: 2 years after surgery