This study plans to learn more about transfusion of a human blood component called plasma in patients who have liver problems. Patients are asked to be in this study because they have liver disease and therefore may require the transfusion of plasma. The dose of plasma required to reach certain blood clotting laboratory targets is usually determined by clinicians. Due to the complexity of the patient's blood clotting disorder, determining the appropriate dose of plasma is very difficult. The investigators have developed a dosing table based on information from other patients with liver disease and the investigators are testing it to see if it is a more accurate dosing tool then clinician chosen dosing of plasma in patients with liver disease who need one or more plasma transfusions
Clinicians currently transfuse plasma to International Normalized Ratio (INR) targets without an understanding of the dose response characteristics of plasma in bleeding patients with liver disease. Epidemiologic studies show that INR is infrequently corrected to target INR values after clinician chosen plasma transfusion doses in patients with liver disease. Plasma transfusion is frequently given to patients prior to procedures and during active bleeding in this patient population though there are no dosing guidelines to aid clinicians in reaching INR targets in patients with liver disease. Previous studies suggest that patients with liver disease may need more plasma then patients without liver disease to correct any given pre-transfusion INR (INR value measured before plasma transfusion) to the same post-transfusion INR target (INR value measured after plasma transfusion). Current physician dosing of plasma is variable and rarely successful at reaching stated INR targets. The INR thresholds, commonly used triggers for plasma transfusion by Gastro-Intestinal (GI), Hepatology and critical care physicians at our institution range from 1.5-3.0 in bleeding or pre-procedural patients with liver disease representing tremendous variability. When we evaluated plasma transfusion dosing practices in bleeding patients with liver disease over 8 years, we demonstrated that these same physicians rarely met stated theoretical targets. Over or under dosing plasma in these patients may lead to serious clinical complications.The target INR goal was to be within ±0.1 after the first round of FFP transfusion, and was selected because underdosing can result in prolonged bleeding, delayed procedure times, and more rounds of FFP transfusion. Furthermore, overdosing can result in excess cost, increased portal pressures, bleeding, transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO), and transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
An INR dose-response curve with associated transfusion algorithm was generated for plasma in bleeding patients with chronic liver disease. In the intervention arm we will determine the plasma transfusion dose using the algorithm dosing table based on the pre-transfusion INR and the clinician chosen INR target. In the usual care group the dosing will be determined by the clinician.
INR result prior to Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) transfusion determined by clinical lab testing performed within 6 hours to 1 day before transfusion start time.
INR result after Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) transfusion completed, determined by clinical lab testing performed within 1 hour after transfusion completed.
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Number of Participants That Reached Targeted International Normalized Ratio (INR) Within ±0.1 After First Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) Transfusion Completed.
Ability of dosing algorithm to accurately predict necessary plasma dose (ml/kg), required to reach commonly targeted International Normalized Ratio (INR) values, compared to clinician chosen plasma transfusion dose, as determined by dose-response curve. The primary outcome was achievement of the target INR within ±0.1 after the first round of FFP transfusion. This primary outcome was selected because underdosing can result in prolonged bleeding, delayed procedure times, and more rounds of FFP transfusion. Furthermore, overdosing can result in excess cost, increased portal pressures, bleeding, transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO), and transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI).
Time frame: within 1 hour after entire plasma transfusion
Time (Hours) From Initiation of First Dose of Plasma to Initiation of Planned Procedure (in Patient Undergoing Transfusion Before a Procedure) for Clinician Dosing Compared to Algorithm Dosing Strategies.
Decreased time between initiation of plasma infusion, achieving a corrected target INR and start of planned patient procedures would potentially improve care efficiency and/or allow faster intervention in unstable patients.
Time frame: hours from first dose to initiation of procedure, anticipated timeframe between 1 minute to 8 hours.
Dose Difference (Average # Units) Between Clinician Dosing and Algorithm Dosing (Units of FFP) Per Patient.
Time frame: within 1 hour after entire plasma transfusion
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for duration of hospital stay, anticipated within 1 Day to 28 Days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.