Chronic lateral epicondylitis is usually managed conservatively. The purpose of this single-blinded, randomized, controlled study is to compare the clinical therapeutic effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in comparison with cryoultrasound (Cryo-US) therapy in chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE) during a period of 12 months.
Eighty participants with chronic LE were randomly assigned to receive 3 ESWT sessions at 48/72-hours intervals -2400 impulses at energy flux density 0.14-0.20 mJ/mm2 at each session- (ESWT Group, n=40) or 12 Cryo-US therapy sessions (4 daily sessions per week) in a continuous modality at 1.8 Watt/cm2 and -2˚C at each session- (Cryo-US Group, n=40). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and satisfactory results, considered as the sum of the excellent and good scores in the Roles and Maudsley score, were used as outcome measures at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Three sessions were carried out, with the time interval between sessions spanning between 48 and 72 hours. In each session, 2400 pulses were administered with energy flux density (EDF) ranging from 0.14 and 0.20 mJ/mm2, depending on the maximum tolerated pain of each patient. Analgesics or local anaesthetics were not administered before, during or after treatment.
Cryo-US therapy was performed in a continuous emission modality, using an ultrasound emission power rating of 1,8 Watt/cm2, and a temperature of -2˚C, for a total of 12 sessions lasting 20 minutes each. The treatment was performed in 3 weeks (4 daily sessions per week).
Sant'Andrea Hospital
Rome, Italy, Italy
Difference of two points in pain recorded on the VAS
a difference of two points in pain recorded on the VAS during a maximum voluntary resisted isometric wrist extension with the elbow in extension (Cozen test), between the ESWT Group and the Cryo-US Group, in at least one of the periods taken into account.
Time frame: 3, 6, or 12 months after the end of treatments
Patients satisfaction based on the Roles and Maudsley score
the number of patients who achieved at least 50% satisfactory results at 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment. Satisfactory results were described as the sum of the excellent and good scores based on the Roles and Maudsley score.
Time frame: 3, 6, or 12 months after the end of treatments
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.